Nagle R J, Bell N L
University of South Carolina, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 May;51(3):396-400. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199505)51:3<396::aid-jclp2270510312>3.0.co;2-a.
This study investigated the comparability between three "amazingly" short forms of the WAIS-R (a dyad, triad, and tetrad) suggested by Kaufman, Ishikuma, and Kaufman-Packer (1991) and the complete battery among a sample of 114 educable mentally handicapped adolescents. Results indicate that the short forms are highly correlated with the complete battery Full Scale IQs, and all three short forms yielded scores, on average, within 2 points of the complete battery. Analyses at an individual level revealed that more than 90% of the sample fell within 3 SEM (9 points) of the FSIQ for all three short forms. Overall results are consistent with previous studies and support the use of these "amazingly" short forms.
本研究调查了考夫曼、石熊和考夫曼 - 帕克（1991年）提出的韦氏成人智力量表修订版（WAIS - R）的三种“惊人”简短形式（二元组、三元组和四元组）与完整测验组在114名可教育的智力障碍青少年样本中的可比性。结果表明，简短形式与完整测验组的全量表智商高度相关，并且所有三种简短形式得出的分数平均比完整测验组相差不到2分。个体水平分析显示，对于所有三种简短形式，超过90%的样本落在全量表智商的3个标准误（9分）范围内。总体结果与先前研究一致，并支持使用这些“惊人”的简短形式。
