Boone K B, Savodnik I, Ghaffarian S, Lee A, Freeman D, Berman N G
Department of Psychiatry, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 May;51(3):457-63. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199505)51:3<457::aid-jclp2270510322>3.0.co;2-7.
The relationship between apparent faking of cognitive impairment (as detected by such "malingering" tests as 15-item Memorization and Dot Counting) and faking of psychiatric symptoms has not been investigated formally. In addition, no empirical literature is available on the relationship between personality traits and faking of cognitive symptoms. Of 154 subjects who claimed "stress" psychiatric injury, 12% appeared to be faking cognitive impairment; 4.5% failed the 15-item Memorization Test, and 10% failed the Dot Counting task. Faking of cognitive symptoms occurred in only 23% of subjects who were faking/exaggerating psychological symptoms on the MCMI. Malingering test failure was associated with significant elevations on MCMI personality scales, although this appeared to be an artifact of attempts to fake/exaggerate on the MCMI, rather than a reflection of "true" personality traits.
认知功能损害的明显伪装(通过诸如15项记忆测试和点数测试等“诈病”测试来检测)与精神症状伪装之间的关系尚未得到正式研究。此外,关于人格特质与认知症状伪装之间的关系,尚无实证文献。在154名声称患有“应激性”精神损伤的受试者中,12%的人似乎在伪装认知功能损害;4.5%的人在15项记忆测试中未通过,10%的人在点数测试中未通过。在明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MCMI)上伪装/夸大心理症状的受试者中,只有23%的人伪装了认知症状。诈病测试未通过与MCMI人格量表得分显著升高有关,尽管这似乎是在MCMI上伪装/夸大的尝试所导致的假象,而非“真实”人格特质的反映。