对伪装指控的质疑：明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版（MCMI-II）与明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版（MMPI-2）测试结果之间关系的影响

Raising doubts about claims of malingering: implications of relationships between MCMI-II and MMPI-2 performances.

作者信息

Grillo J, Brown R S, Hilsabeck R, Price J R, Lees-Haley P R

机构信息

Lees-Haley Psychological Corporation, Encino, California.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):651-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<651::aid-jclp2270500424>3.0.co;2-c.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<651::aid-jclp2270500424>3.0.co;2-c

PMID:7983217

Abstract

Test results from 90 personal injury claimants were used to explore the relationship between personality disorders (Dependent, Histrionic, Compulsive, Schizoid, Schizotypal, Paranoid, Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, Avoidant, and Passive-Aggressive) as assessed by the MCMI-II and response style measured by MMPI-2 validity scales (F, K, L, F-K, O-S, Es, and FBS). With the exception of the Dependent and Narcissistic scales, all personality disorder scales were found to have a significant relationship with validity indicators in the direction of faking bad. These results suggest that the presence of characterological factors (i.e., a personality disorder), rather than malingering, contributes to exaggerated results in a forensic setting. Implications for future research are addressed.

摘要

来自90名人身伤害索赔者的测试结果被用于探究由MCMI-II评估的人格障碍（依赖型、表演型、强迫型、分裂样、分裂型、偏执型、自恋型、边缘型、反社会型、回避型和被动攻击型）与由MMPI-2效度量表（F、K、L、F-K、O-S、Es和FBS）测量的应答方式之间的关系。除了依赖型和自恋型量表外，发现所有的人格障碍量表与效度量表在伪装不良的方向上都存在显著关系。这些结果表明，性格因素（即人格障碍）的存在而非诈病，导致了法医环境中结果的夸大。文中还讨论了对未来研究的启示。