Hase J C, Ainamo J, Etemadzadeh H, Aström M
Clinical Research Department, Biosurface AB, Malmö, Sweden.
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jul;22(7):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00801.x.
A double-blind, randomised, 4-week clinical trial with parallel group design in 57 patients with gingivitis was conducted for studying the antibacterial efficacy and safety of a delmopinol HCl aqueous solution 2 mg/ml (0.2% w/v), which was used for unsupervised mouth-rinsing and compared with placebo and chlorhexidine digluconate 2 mg/ml (0.2% w/v, Hibitane Dental, ICI Pharmaceuticals, UK). The plaque index and plaque wet weight were used to measure plaque formation, and gingival fluid flow and bleeding on probing to measure gingivitis. According to the reduction from baseline, chlorhexidine showed a significantly better effect on plaque formation than the placebo after 4 weeks treatment for both plaque measurements. Delmopinol exhibited significantly lower plaque index scores than placebo. The difference between chlorhexidine and delmopinol was not statistically significant for any of the plaque measurements. For gingivitis, no statistically significant differences were obtained between the effects of delmopinol, chlorhexidine and placebo. A transient anaesthetic sensation in the oral mucosa was experienced more clearly by the patients in the delmopinol group than by those using chlorhexidine or placebo rinses. Rinsing with chlorhexidine resulted in more staining of the teeth and tongue than did delmopinol and placebo. The placebo solution tasted better than the 2 active solutions. The results showed that rinsing with either delmopinol HCl aqueous solution 2 mg/ml or chlorhexidine digluconate 2 mg/ml 2x daily for 60 as a supplement to normal oral hygiene, following an initial professional tooth cleaning, leads to a lower plaque formation than rinsing with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对57例牙龈炎患者进行了一项为期4周的双盲、随机、平行组设计的临床试验,以研究2mg/ml(0.2%w/v)盐酸地莫匹醇水溶液的抗菌疗效和安全性。该溶液用于无监督漱口,并与安慰剂和2mg/ml(0.2%w/v)葡萄糖酸洗必泰(英国ICI制药公司的Hibitane Dental)进行比较。菌斑指数和菌斑湿重用于测量菌斑形成,龈沟液流量和探诊出血用于测量牙龈炎。根据与基线的降低情况,在4周治疗后,对于两种菌斑测量,洗必泰对菌斑形成的效果均显著优于安慰剂。地莫匹醇的菌斑指数得分显著低于安慰剂。对于任何菌斑测量,洗必泰和地莫匹醇之间的差异均无统计学意义。对于牙龈炎,地莫匹醇、洗必泰和安慰剂的效果之间未获得统计学上的显著差异。与使用洗必泰或安慰剂漱口的患者相比,地莫匹醇组患者更明显地感觉到口腔黏膜有短暂的麻醉感。与地莫匹醇和安慰剂相比,用洗必泰漱口导致牙齿和舌头染色更多。安慰剂溶液的味道比两种活性溶液更好。结果表明,在最初进行专业牙齿清洁后,作为正常口腔卫生的补充,每天2次用2mg/ml盐酸地莫匹醇水溶液或2mg/ml葡萄糖酸洗必泰漱口60秒,比用安慰剂漱口导致的菌斑形成更少。(摘要截选至250字)