Suppr超能文献

与0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和安慰剂相比,6个月使用0.2%盐酸地莫匹醇。(I). 对牙菌斑形成和牙龈炎的影响。

6-month use of 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride in comparison with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo. (I). Effect on plaque formation and gingivitis.

作者信息

Hase J C, Attström R, Edwardsson S, Kelty E, Kisch J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Biosurface AB, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Sep;25(9):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02516.x.

Abstract

A double-blind, randomised, 6-month clinical trial with parallel group design in 149 patients with gingivitis was conducted to study the efficacy and safety of delmopinol hydrochloride 2 mg/ml (0.2% w/v, Decapinol Mouthwash) used for partly supervised mouthrinsing in comparison with chlorhexidine digluconate 2 mg/ml (0.2% w/v, Hibitane Dental, ICI Pharmaceuticals, UK) and placebo as an addition to normal oral hygiene. Assessments of efficacy were performed using the plaque index and bleeding on probing (BOP). Delmopinol showed 22% lower plaque index scores than placebo after 3 months (p<0.01) and 13% lower scores after 6 months. The corresponding figures for chlorhexidine were 38% (p<0.001) and 38% (p<0.001) after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Bleeding on probing was reduced for delmopinol in comparison with placebo by 11% after 3 months and by 18% (p<0.05) after 6 months. For chlorhexidine the corresponding figures were 18% (p<0.01) and 22% (p<0.01) after 3 and 6 months, respectively. While chlorhexidine showed greater plaque reduction than delmopinol (p<0.01 at 6 months), no statistically significant difference was reached between these two solutions regarding BOP. Both active solutions showed an increased amount of dental calculus in comparison with placebo. A transient anaesthetic sensation in the oral mucosa and taste affection were commonly reported adverse events in both the delmopinol and the chlorhexidine groups. The number of patients withdrawn from treatment due to adverse events or lack of cooperation was 7 in the chlorhexidine group, 4 in the placebo group and 1 in the delmopinol group. The results showed that rinsing with either 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride or 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate twice daily for 60 secs for 6 months results in less plaque formation and gingivitis than rinsing with placebo. Mouthrinsing with the 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride solution was well accepted in this study.

摘要

对149名牙龈炎患者进行了一项为期6个月的双盲、随机、平行组设计的临床试验,以研究2mg/ml盐酸地莫匹诺(0.2%w/v,Decapinol漱口水)在部分监督下用于漱口的疗效和安全性,与2mg/ml葡萄糖酸氯己定(0.2%w/v,Hibitane Dental,ICI制药公司,英国)和安慰剂作为常规口腔卫生的补充进行比较。使用菌斑指数和探诊出血(BOP)进行疗效评估。3个月后,地莫匹诺的菌斑指数得分比安慰剂低22%(p<0.01),6个月后低13%。葡萄糖酸氯己定在3个月和6个月后的相应数据分别为38%(p<0.001)和38%(p<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,地莫匹诺在3个月后探诊出血减少了11%,6个月后减少了18%(p<0.05)。葡萄糖酸氯己定在3个月和6个月后的相应数据分别为18%(p<0.01)和22%(p<0.01)。虽然葡萄糖酸氯己定比地莫匹诺表现出更大的菌斑减少(6个月时p<0.01),但在BOP方面这两种溶液之间没有达到统计学上的显著差异。与安慰剂相比,两种活性溶液的牙石量均增加。口腔黏膜的短暂麻醉感和味觉影响是地莫匹诺组和葡萄糖酸氯己定组常见的不良事件报告。因不良事件或缺乏合作而退出治疗的患者人数,葡萄糖酸氯己定组为7人,安慰剂组为4人,地莫匹诺组为1人。结果表明,每天用0.2%盐酸地莫匹诺或0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口60秒,持续6个月,与用安慰剂漱口相比,菌斑形成和牙龈炎更少。在本研究中,用0.2%盐酸地莫匹诺溶液漱口被广泛接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验