Dootson S
Intensive Therapy Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1995 Jul;22(1):183-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010183.x.
Multiple triangulation is an approach to research which is becoming increasingly popular among nurse researchers. It is an attempt to improve validity by combining various techniques in one study. Provided that the researcher is well informed, the approach can be successful. However, the issue becomes clouded because in their excitement some nurse researchers seem to have forgotten that the roots of research stem from one of two paradigms, or world views. This has led to the suggestion that paradigms may be combined, and has caused the validity of multiple triangulation to be called into question. In an attempt to unravel the muddle this paper describes multiple triangulation and goes on to suggest where the confusion has occurred. It concludes that multiple triangulation is a valid technique providing that researchers remember that their work will always be influenced by a single paradigm.
多重三角互证法是一种研究方法,在护士研究人员中越来越受欢迎。它试图通过在一项研究中结合各种技术来提高效度。只要研究人员知识渊博,这种方法就能成功。然而,问题变得模糊不清,因为一些护士研究人员在兴奋之余似乎忘记了研究的根源来自两种范式或世界观之一。这导致了范式可以结合的观点,并使多重三角互证法的效度受到质疑。为了理清这一混乱局面,本文描述了多重三角互证法,并进而指出混淆发生的地方。结论是,只要研究人员记住他们的工作总是会受到单一范式的影响,多重三角互证法就是一种有效的技术。