Bader J D, Shugars D A
Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7590, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 1995 Summer;55(3):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1995.tb02364.x.
The first comprehensive review of the recent literature regarding variation in dentists' clinical treatment decisions is presented.
Variation among dentists in the clinical decisions they make as well as the methods used for assessing this variation are examined at three levels of aggregation of clinical decisions: the dental practice (or dentist), the patient, and the individual tooth.
The extent to which differences in dentists' clinical decisions have been examined is limited. Studies are particularly sparse at the level of the dental practice, where the aggregate of dentists' treatment decisions is reflected. Further, the methods and measures used to assess variation tend to be different across studies, making quantification of variation difficult. Nevertheless, the available information reflects substantial variation in measures such as rates of provision of specific procedures; cost and numbers of procedures recommended for specific patients; and diagnoses, intervention decisions, and treatment selections for individual teeth.
Even when differences in patients are controlled, variation in dentists' clinical decisions is ubiquitous. While its consequences remain undetermined, the variation in basic clinical decisions such as caries diagnosis signals the need to consider the extent to which the appropriateness of care is affected.
对近期有关牙医临床治疗决策差异的文献进行首次全面综述。
在临床决策的三个汇总层面——牙科诊所(或牙医)、患者以及单个牙齿——考察牙医所做临床决策的差异以及用于评估这种差异的方法。
对牙医临床决策差异的研究程度有限。在牙科诊所层面的研究尤为稀少,而该层面反映了牙医治疗决策的总体情况。此外,不同研究用于评估差异的方法和指标往往不同,这使得差异的量化变得困难。尽管如此,现有信息表明在诸如特定治疗程序的提供率、针对特定患者推荐的程序成本和数量,以及单个牙齿的诊断、干预决策和治疗选择等指标上存在显著差异。
即使控制了患者之间 differences(此处原文有误,可能是“differences”),牙医临床决策的差异依然普遍存在。虽然其后果尚未确定,但诸如龋齿诊断等基本临床决策的差异表明有必要考虑医疗适宜性受到影响的程度。