• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measuring patient preferences: rating scale versus standard gamble.

作者信息

Bowe T R

机构信息

Decision Systems Associates, Woodside, CA 94062-4119, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1995 Jul-Sep;15(3):283-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500311.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9501500311
PMID:7564942
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Measuring patient preferences: rating scale versus standard gamble.测量患者偏好：评分量表与标准博弈法
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jul-Sep;15(3):283-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500311.
2
Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard.
Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6):580-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906000-00007.
3
Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.测试标准博弈在“成功”和“失败”框架下的内部一致性。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.024.
4
Conventional and chained standard gambles in the assessment of coronary heart disease prevention and treatment. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group.
Med Decis Making. 1999 Apr-Jun;19(2):149-56. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900205.
5
Comparison of the rating scale and the standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease.评估量表与标准博弈法在衡量胆结石疾病患者对治疗结果的偏好方面的比较。
Med Decis Making. 1994 Oct-Dec;14(4):307-14. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400401.
6
Assessing preferences about the DNR order: does it depend on how you ask?
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jul-Sep;15(3):209-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500303.
7
Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures.纤维肌痛患者的效用及其与其他结局指标的关联。
J Rheumatol. 1995 Aug;22(8):1536-43.
8
Reproducibility of the School-Based Nutrition Monitoring Questionnaire among fourth-grade students in Texas.德克萨斯州四年级学生中基于学校的营养监测问卷的可重复性
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008 Jan-Feb;40(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.375.
9
Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs).基于偏好的慢性肌肉骨骼疾病（MSKDs）患儿健康相关生活质量（HRQL）测量
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):314-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256008.
10
Do Probability and Certainty Equivalent Techniques Lead to Inconsistent Results? Evidence from Gambles Involving Life-Years and Quality of Life.概率与确定性等价技术会导致不一致的结果吗？来自涉及生命年限和生活质量的赌博的证据。
Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):413-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.019. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Desiderata for sharable computable biomedical knowledge for learning health systems.学习型健康系统中可共享、可计算生物医学知识的必备条件。
Learn Health Syst. 2018 Aug 3;2(4):e10065. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10065. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation.克服基于偏好的健康效益测量技术的固有问题：肾脏移植背景下的实证研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 14;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-3.
3
Health status utility assessment by standard gamble: a comparison of the probability equivalence and the lottery equivalence approaches.
Pharm Res. 1998 Jan;15(1):105-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1011913123135.