Predebon J
University of Sydney, Department of Psychology, NSW, Australia.
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Jun;80(3 Pt 1):941-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.80.3.941.
12 independent groups of 18 subjects each estimated the duration of one of six 'empty' intervals (10, 18, 26, 34, 42, and 50 sec.). Subjects were told of the time task either prior to (prospective paradigm) or after (retrospective paradigm) the presentation of the interval. The results are consistent with Hicks' 1992 finding of an interaction between temporal paradigm and interval duration. Whereas the shorter intervals (< 42 sec.) were estimated accurately in both the retrospective and the prospective paradigms, the longer intervals were estimated rather accurately in the prospective paradigm and underestimated in the retrospective paradigm.
12个独立的组，每组18名受试者，分别估计六个“空白”间隔（10秒、18秒、26秒、34秒、42秒和50秒）之一的持续时间。在间隔呈现之前（前瞻性范式）或之后（回顾性范式）告知受试者时间任务。结果与希克斯1992年关于时间范式和间隔持续时间之间相互作用的发现一致。较短的间隔（<42秒）在回顾性和前瞻性范式中都能被准确估计，而较长的间隔在前瞻性范式中估计得相当准确，在回顾性范式中则被低估。
