Human performance on an analogue of an interval bisection task.

Two experiments used normal adult human subjects in an analogue of a time interval bisection task frequently used with animals. All presented durations were defined by the time between two very brief clicks, and all durations were less than 1 sec, to avoid complications arising from chronometric counting. In Experiment 1 different groups of subjects received standard durations of either 0.2 and 0.8 or 0.1 and 0.9 sec and then classified a range of durations including these values in terms of their similarity to the standard short (0.2- or 0.1-sec) and long (0.8- or 0.9-sec) durations. The bisection point (defined as the duration classified as "long" on 50% of trials) was located at 0.43 sec in the 0.2-0.8 group, and at 0.46 sec in the 0.1-0.9 group. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 using a within-subject procedure. The bisection point of both 0.2- and 0.8 sec and 0.1- and 0.9-sec durations was found to be 0.44 sec. Both experiments thus found the bisection point to be located at a duration just lower than the arithmetic mean of the standard short and long durations, rather than at the geometric mean, as in animal experiments. Some other performance measures, such as difference limen, and Weber ratio, were, however, of similar values to those found in bisection tasks with animals. A theoretical model assuming that humans bisect by taking the difference between a presented duration and the short and long standards, as well as having a bias to respond "long", fitted the data well. The model incorporated scalar representations of standard durations and thus illustrated a way in which the obtained results, although different from those found with animal subjects, could be reconciled with scalar timing theory.