Catipović-Veselica K, Amidzić V, Burić D, Ilakovac V, Kozmar D, Durijancek J, Skrinjarić-Cincar S, Catipović B, Mujić N, Lauc A
University Department of Medicine Medical Faculty, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Jun;76(3 Pt 1):1019-24. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3.1019.
We examined the prevalence of Type A/B behavior and Emotion Profiles in 1084 employees. This report focused on the relationship between Type A behavior and eight basic emotion dimensions. Of the 1084 subjects 710 (65%) scored as Type A and 374 (34.5%) as Type B. The mean Bortner scores for all subjects were 182.8 (SD = 33.7), scores on emotional dimensions for Incorporation and Reproduction were high, and intensities for Ejection and Destruction were low; mean scores on other emotions were normal. Significant differences between Type A and Type B scores were found on six emotional dimensions. Subjects classified as Type A had ratings lower on trustful, controlled, and timid and higher on aggressive, distrustful, and uncontrolled than did persons classified as Type B. There were no differences between Type A and Type B scores on the emotion dimensions of Reproduction and Deprivation. Our data suggest multiple emotional components may comprise the Type A behavior pattern. This is important for behavioral counseling programs and early preventive efforts which could be aimed at reducing the intensity of Type A behaviors.
我们对1084名员工的A型/ B型行为及情绪特征进行了调查。本报告重点关注A型行为与八个基本情绪维度之间的关系。在1084名受试者中，710人（65%）被评为A型，374人（34.5%）被评为B型。所有受试者的博特纳平均得分为182.8（标准差= 33.7），融入和再现情绪维度的得分较高，而排出和破坏的强度较低；其他情绪的平均得分正常。在六个情绪维度上发现了A型和B型得分的显著差异。被归类为A型的受试者在信任、可控和胆小方面的评分低于B型受试者，而在攻击性、不信任和不可控方面的评分高于B型受试者。在再现和剥夺情绪维度上，A型和B型得分没有差异。我们的数据表明，多种情绪成分可能构成A型行为模式。这对于行为咨询项目和早期预防工作很重要，这些工作可以旨在降低A型行为的强度。
