Arcangeli G, Micheli A, Verna L, Saracino B, Arcangeli G, Giovinazzo G, D'Angelo L, Pansadoro V, Sternberg C N
Radiation Therapy Center, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Radiother Oncol. 1995 May;35(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01527-n.
The prognosis for irradiated patients with localized prostatic carcinoma following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been debated. Controversy centers upon whether or not TURP has an adverse effect on the outcome. A retrospective analysis of 264 patients treated during 1974-1991 with radical external beam radiotherapy was performed. Ten patients who were irradiated postoperatively were excluded. One hundred and nine patients with urinary obstruction underwent TURP. In another 155 patients, pathological diagnosis was made by needle aspiration or tru-cut biopsies. One hundred and one patients received endocrine manipulation, 58 (40%) in the needle biopsy group, and 43 (39.5%) in the TURP group. Lymph node staging by pelvic lymphadenectomy (20 cases), lymphangiography (15 cases), and CAT and/or NMR (113 cases) was performed in 148 patients. Nodal metastases were found in 38 patients, 19 in the needle biopsy group, and 19 in the TURP group. Disease-related, disease-free and metastasis-free survivals were calculated for all stages and within each tumor stage and histological grade for both groups. Correlation of pretreatment factors with clinical outcome was evaluated by multivariate analysis. Overall, disease-related survival was significantly higher (P = 0.05) in patients undergoing needle biopsy than in those who had TURP (58% vs. 38% at 10 years). This difference was more significant in the subset of patients with well differentiated tumors (P < 0.01). However, no difference could be observed between the two groups in histological grade 2 and 3 tumors or by stage comparison.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后接受放疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的预后一直存在争议。争议的焦点在于TURP是否会对治疗结果产生不利影响。对1974年至1991年间接受根治性外照射放疗的264例患者进行了回顾性分析。排除术后接受放疗的10例患者。109例有尿路梗阻的患者接受了TURP。另外155例患者通过针吸活检或切割活检进行病理诊断。101例患者接受了内分泌治疗,针吸活检组58例(40%),TURP组43例(39.5%)。148例患者通过盆腔淋巴结清扫术(20例)、淋巴管造影(15例)以及CAT和/或NMR(113例)进行淋巴结分期。38例患者发现有淋巴结转移,针吸活检组19例,TURP组19例。计算了两组所有分期以及各肿瘤分期和组织学分级的疾病相关生存率、无病生存率和无转移生存率。通过多变量分析评估治疗前因素与临床结果的相关性。总体而言,针吸活检患者的疾病相关生存率显著高于接受TURP的患者(10年时分别为58%和38%,P = 0.05)。这种差异在高分化肿瘤患者亚组中更为显著(P < 0.01)。然而,在2级和3级组织学肿瘤患者或按分期比较时,两组之间未观察到差异。(摘要截选至250字)