Perkonigg A, Wittchen H U, Winkler S
Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, München.
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):370-7.
This article describes results of an evaluation study of a seminar for patients with anxiety, an education program for primary care physicians. Before and after the two seminars, 109 participants filled out a questionnaire about their opinion on the program as well as their attitudes, experience and knowledge in dealing with anxiety patients. They were compared with a control group which did not take part in the program. After 3 and 12 months, a part of the participants was interviewed again. It was found that anxiety patients call for a lot of attention from general practitioners and that diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge is not sufficient. The educational program was highly rated by the participants. The seminars were conducted in the practice by most of the participants in groups as well as on single patients. It became evident that in spite of high expenses there is a wide acceptance of such seminars and that the variables examined up to now indicate a surprisingly high efficiency of the educational programme.
本文描述了一项针对焦虑症患者研讨会的评估研究结果,该研讨会是一项面向初级保健医生的教育项目。在两次研讨会前后,109名参与者填写了一份问卷,内容涉及他们对该项目的看法以及他们在处理焦虑症患者方面的态度、经验和知识。他们与未参加该项目的对照组进行了比较。在3个月和12个月后,部分参与者再次接受了访谈。研究发现,焦虑症患者需要全科医生给予大量关注,且诊断和治疗知识不足。该教育项目得到了参与者的高度评价。大多数参与者在诊所中以小组形式以及针对单个患者开展了研讨会。显而易见,尽管成本高昂,但此类研讨会仍得到广泛认可,而且目前所考察的变量表明该教育项目具有出奇高的效率。