Suppr超能文献

一位从事死亡学研究的行为科学家的一些主观反应。

Some subjective reactions of a behavioral scientist involved in thanatological research.

作者信息

Devins G M

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Med. 1978;9(3-4):307-15. doi: 10.2190/5djw-2229-rh8b-4x8f.

Abstract

Ethical and pragmatic considerations often preclude the application of classical experimental approaches to in vivo thanatological research. While quasi-experimental and correlational designs may be employed to circumvent a number of potential problems, many more empirically testable research questions simply remain unaskable in the applied setting. Clearly, extra-experimental sources of information are of particular value in such situations. The present paper reports some of the observations and subjective reactions experienced by the writer while engaged in a series of experimental thanatological research studies. The issues addressed include the motivations of thanatological investigators and research participants, personal awareness of death, displacement of grief, anxieties about personal utility, paternalism, and honesty (i.e., frankness) as a primary ethic in facilitating a peaceful, "natural," death in the moribund individual.

摘要

伦理和实际考虑因素常常使经典实验方法无法应用于体内死亡学研究。虽然可以采用准实验和相关设计来规避一些潜在问题,但在应用环境中,仍有许多更具实证可检验性的研究问题根本无法提出。显然,在这种情况下,实验之外的信息来源具有特殊价值。本文报告了作者在进行一系列实验性死亡学研究时所经历的一些观察结果和主观反应。所探讨的问题包括死亡学研究者和研究参与者的动机、对死亡的个人认知、悲伤的转移、对个人效用的焦虑、家长作风以及诚实(即坦率)作为促进濒死个体安详、“自然”死亡的首要伦理准则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验