Suppr超能文献

静脉注射与硬膜外注射可乐定用于术后患者自控镇痛的比较。

Comparison of intravenous and epidural clonidine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia.

作者信息

Bernard J M, Kick O, Bonnet F

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1995 Oct;81(4):706-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199510000-00009.

Abstract

Both epidural and intravenous clonidine are used to provide postoperative analgesia, but in predetermined doses. This double-blind randomized study was designed to 1) determine the clonidine dose inducing pain relief after major orthopedic surgery, when controlled by patient, either intravenously or epidurally; and 2) assess whether these two administration routes are clinically equivalent. At the first complaint of pain after scoliosis correction, patients received an initial dose of 8 micrograms/kg clonidine during 30 min either intravenously (n = 12) or epidurally (n = 12). Then, clonidine was given using a patient-controlled analgesia pump via the corresponding administration route. In both cases, the bolus dose was set at 30 micrograms and the lockout interval at 15 min. Pain (0-100 scale), clonidine requirements, sedation (0-4 scale), and hemodynamics (by fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter) were measured before and 15, 30, 120, 240, 360, 480, and 600 min after the loading dose was started. Plasma clonidine concentrations and arterial blood gases were determined at the 15th, 30th, 240th, and 480th min. Self-administered and total clonidine doses were larger in the intravenous group than in the epidural group (at 600 min: 372 +/- 110 vs 235 +/- 144 micrograms, and including the initial dose, 814 +/- 114 vs 652 +/- 187 micrograms; mean +/- SD). Clonidine administration resulted in pain relief and sedation in both groups but, for comparable pain relief, sedation scores were lower in the epidural group. No intergroup differences in hemodynamic data were observed, although the decrease in blood pressure occurred earlier in the intravenous group. Plasma clonidine concentrations were higher in the intravenous group than in the epidural group (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs 1.5 +/- 0.5 ng/mL after the initial dose and 2.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 ng/mL during self-administration; mean +/- SD). We conclude that analgesia can be achieved postoperatively by both epidural and intravenous clonidine administration. The epidural route is associated with significant reductions in self-administered clonidine dose, and thus in the plasma clonidine concentration, and the level of sedation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

硬膜外和静脉注射可乐定均用于提供术后镇痛,但使用的是预先确定的剂量。这项双盲随机研究旨在:1)确定在骨科大手术后,由患者自控静脉或硬膜外注射可乐定时,能诱导疼痛缓解的剂量;2)评估这两种给药途径在临床上是否等效。在脊柱侧弯矫正术后首次出现疼痛主诉时,患者在30分钟内静脉注射(n = 12)或硬膜外注射(n = 12)初始剂量为8微克/千克的可乐定。然后,通过相应给药途径使用患者自控镇痛泵给予可乐定。在两种情况下,推注剂量均设定为30微克,锁定时间间隔为15分钟。在开始负荷剂量前以及开始后15、30、120、240、360、480和600分钟测量疼痛(0 - 100分制)、可乐定需求量、镇静程度(0 - 4分制)和血流动力学(通过光纤肺动脉导管)。在第15、30、240和480分钟测定血浆可乐定浓度和动脉血气。静脉组自行给药和总的可乐定剂量均高于硬膜外组(600分钟时:372±110微克对235±144微克,包括初始剂量则为814±114微克对652±187微克;均值±标准差)。两组给予可乐定都能缓解疼痛并产生镇静作用,但在疼痛缓解程度相当的情况下,硬膜外组的镇静评分更低。尽管静脉组血压下降出现得更早,但未观察到血流动力学数据的组间差异。静脉组的血浆可乐定浓度高于硬膜外组(初始剂量后为2.5±0.6纳克/毫升对1.5±0.5纳克/毫升,自行给药期间为2.1±0.5纳克/毫升对1.5±0.4纳克/毫升;均值±标准差)。我们得出结论,硬膜外和静脉注射可乐定都可在术后实现镇痛。硬膜外途径可显著减少自行给药的可乐定剂量,从而降低血浆可乐定浓度和镇静程度。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验