Kosaka T, Sugaya J, Yoshida S, Takano Y, Nakano Y, Akiyama T, Kiriyama M, Tomita F, Saito H, Kita I
Second Dept. of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995 Sep;22(11):1582-5.
We analyzed the clinical response, toxicities, ambulatory and overall survival time among 51 patients with inoperable gastric cancer, to evaluate chemotherapies and drug delivery routes. Twenty-nine patients were treated by Methotrexate/5-FU (FMTX) therapy and 22 by 5-FU/CDDP (FP) therapy. Twenty-five patients were treated by intra-arterial (IA) route and 26 by intra-venous (IV). The response rate of IA therapy was higher than that of IV therapy (p < 0.05), 48% and 19%, respectively. Median survival times of FMTX and FP were 361 and 289 days, respectively, and the 1-year survival rates of FMTX and FP were 44% and 33%, respectively, with no significant differences. Duration of home chemotherapy with FMTX was longer than that with FP, at 130 and 85 days, respectively. There was no difference between duration of home chemotherapy of IA and that of IV. IA chemotherapy showed a higher response rate than IV, but there were no differences in the incidence of side effects and ambulatory and overall survival time.
我们分析了51例无法手术的胃癌患者的临床反应、毒性、门诊及总生存时间,以评估化疗方案及给药途径。29例患者接受甲氨蝶呤/5-氟尿嘧啶(FMTX)治疗,22例接受5-氟尿嘧啶/顺铂(FP)治疗。25例患者采用动脉内(IA)给药途径,26例采用静脉内(IV)给药途径。IA治疗的缓解率高于IV治疗(p < 0.05),分别为48%和19%。FMTX和FP的中位生存时间分别为361天和289天,FMTX和FP的1年生存率分别为44%和33%,无显著差异。FMTX居家化疗的持续时间长于FP,分别为130天和85天。IA和IV居家化疗的持续时间无差异。IA化疗的缓解率高于IV,但副作用发生率、门诊及总生存时间无差异。