Suppr超能文献

电视辅助胸腔镜手术:自发性气胸的主要治疗方法?

Video-assisted thoracic surgery: primary therapy for spontaneous pneumothorax?

作者信息

Cole F H, Cole F H, Khandekar A, Maxwell J M, Pate J W, Walker W A

机构信息

Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences, Memphis, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Oct;60(4):931-3; discussion 934-5. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00598-f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in current therapy for spontaneous pneumothorax.

METHODS

We compared a retrospective series of 89 patients treated conventionally with a consecutive group of 30 patients undergoing VATS pleural abrasion. The 89 earlier patients were predominantly male (81%). Treatment groups included observation/aspiration (7 or 17%), tube thoracostomy (32 or 36%), multiple tubes (7 or 9%), and thoracotomy (43 or 48%). Of the 30 patients treated with VATS, 18 (66%) were male. Primary indications for operation were recurrent pneumothorax (17) and persistent air leak (9).

RESULTS

Hospital lengths of stay (LOS) for the earlier group were 5 days for simple tube and 7 days for primary thoracotomy; LOS for initial intervention followed by thoractomy exceeded 15 days in all subgroups. The average LOS in the VATS group was 13 days; 6 patients treated with primary VATS (no chest tube) had a mean LOS of 6.5 days. Complications included 3 (10%) prolonged air leaks (more than 7 days) and 2 (7%) early recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

We do not recommend VATS as primary therapy for spontaneous pneumothorax; tube thoracostomy remains the treatment of choice. However, we strongly support surgical intervention early (3 days) in patients with a persistent air leak, and as primary therapy in a nonurgent situation if standard indications exist. This study shows no advantage of VATS over conventional thoracotomy in hospital stay or complication rate.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)在当前自发性气胸治疗中的作用。

方法

我们将89例接受传统治疗的患者的回顾性系列与连续30例接受VATS胸膜摩擦术的患者进行了比较。较早的89例患者以男性为主(81%)。治疗组包括观察/抽吸(7例或17%)、胸腔闭式引流(32例或36%)、多根引流管(7例或9%)和开胸手术(43例或48%)。在30例接受VATS治疗的患者中,18例(66%)为男性。手术的主要指征是复发性气胸(17例)和持续性漏气(9例)。

结果

较早组的住院时间(LOS),单纯胸腔闭式引流为5天,初次开胸手术为7天;在所有亚组中,初次干预后再行开胸手术的住院时间超过15天。VATS组的平均住院时间为13天;6例接受初次VATS(无胸管)治疗的患者平均住院时间为6.5天。并发症包括3例(10%)持续性漏气(超过7天)和2例(7%)早期复发。

结论

我们不推荐将VATS作为自发性气胸的主要治疗方法;胸腔闭式引流仍然是首选治疗方法。然而,我们强烈支持对持续性漏气的患者早期(3天)进行手术干预,以及在存在标准指征的非紧急情况下作为主要治疗方法。本研究表明,VATS在住院时间或并发症发生率方面并不优于传统开胸手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验