Pachuta S M, Meiers J C
Research Department, Naval Dental School, Bethesda, Maryland 20889-5602, USA.
Am J Dent. 1995 Aug;8(4):187-90.
To investigate the effect of various dentin treatments on the microleakage of Class V restorations restored with a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative cement.
Forty extracted noncarious molar teeth received Class V preparations with the occlusal margin in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. Preparations were restored with Fuji II LC glass ionomer restorative material. Five dentin treatments were tested prior to restoration (n = 16): Group 1: without dentin pretreatment; Group 2: with GC Dentin Conditioner (10% polyacrylic acid solution); Group 3: with ProBond Dentin Primer; Group 4: with GC Dentin Conditioner and ProBond Dentin Primer; Group 5: with ProBond Dentin Primer followed by application of ProBond adhesive. Samples were thermocycled, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned to evaluate microleakage. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. SEM analysis was performed on selected samples to examine the dentin/glass ionomer interface.
There was no statistically significant difference between any of the dentin pretreatments with regard to enamel or dentin microleakage. SEM analysis indicated excellent adaptation between glass ionomer and dentin for all treatment groups.
研究各种牙本质处理方法对用树脂改性玻璃离子修复水门汀修复的Ⅴ类洞微渗漏的影响。
40颗拔除的无龋磨牙制备Ⅴ类洞,咬合边缘位于釉质,牙龈边缘位于牙本质。用富士Ⅱ LC玻璃离子修复材料进行修复。在修复前测试5种牙本质处理方法(n = 16):第1组:未进行牙本质预处理;第2组:用GC牙本质调节剂(10%聚丙烯酸溶液);第3组:用ProBond牙本质底漆;第4组:用GC牙本质调节剂和ProBond牙本质底漆;第5组:先用ProBond牙本质底漆,然后涂ProBond粘结剂。样本进行热循环处理,用0.5%碱性品红染色,然后切片以评估微渗漏情况。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析数据,显著性水平为P < 0.05。对选定样本进行扫描电子显微镜分析,以检查牙本质/玻璃离子界面。
在釉质或牙本质微渗漏方面,任何一种牙本质预处理之间均无统计学显著差异。扫描电子显微镜分析表明,所有处理组的玻璃离子与牙本质之间均具有良好的适应性。