Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉手术中阿芬太尼与丙泊酚的持续输注

Continuous infusions of alfentanil and propofol for coronary artery surgery.

作者信息

Roekaerts P M, Gerrits H J, Timmerman B E, de Lange S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995 Aug;9(4):362-7. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80088-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the anesthetic efficacy of two different background infusion rates for alfentanil in a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique using propofol. Therefore, the effects of these infusions on hemodynamic stability and on the suppression of hemodynamic and somatic responses to noxious stimuli were compared.

DESIGN

Prospective and randomized.

SETTING

The study was performed in a university hospital setting. Two patient groups were compared.

INTERVENTIONS

Anesthesia was induced in group 1 (n = 16) with alfentanil 50 micrograms/kg and in group 2 (n = 14) with alfentanil 75 micrograms/kg, infused in 4 min, as well as with an infusion of propofol at a rate of 10 mg/kg/h in both groups. After 4 min, the alfentanil infusion was reduced to 1 microgram/kg/min in group 1 and to 2 micrograms/kg/min in group 2. The propofol infusion was reduced following sternal spread to 3 mg/kg/h. Responses indicating inadequate anesthesia were treated with additional alfentanil bolus doses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Induction of anesthesia in group 1 was associated with significant decreases in systolic and diastolic (-13%) blood pressures, cardiac index (-16%) and left ventricular stroke work index (-31%). Hemodynamic changes were similar in group 2, except for the greater fall in systemic vascular resistance during maintenance of anesthesia. There was no difference in the incidence of breakthrough hypertension between the two groups (in 44% and 43% of the patients, respectively) and in the number of alfentanil bolus supplements. There were also no differences in the incidence of ischemia, myocardial infarction or duration of postoperative ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Because both infusions provided equally stable anesthesia, the lower infusion regimen for alfentanil is the more appropriate technique. Using this technique, the administration of additional alfentanil boluses just before stressful surgical episodes will further improve hemodynamic stability.

摘要

目的

研究在使用丙泊酚的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)技术中,两种不同背景输注速率的阿芬太尼的麻醉效果。因此,比较了这些输注对血流动力学稳定性以及对有害刺激引起的血流动力学和躯体反应抑制的影响。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

地点

该研究在大学医院环境中进行。比较了两个患者组。

干预措施

第1组(n = 16)用50微克/千克阿芬太尼诱导麻醉,第2组(n = 14)用75微克/千克阿芬太尼诱导麻醉,均在4分钟内输注完毕,且两组均以10毫克/千克/小时的速率输注丙泊酚。4分钟后,第1组阿芬太尼输注速率降至1微克/千克/分钟,第2组降至2微克/千克/分钟。胸骨切开后丙泊酚输注速率降至3毫克/千克/小时。麻醉不足的反应用额外的阿芬太尼推注剂量处理。

测量指标及主要结果

第1组麻醉诱导与收缩压和舒张压(-13%)、心脏指数(-16%)和左心室每搏功指数(-31%)显著下降相关。第2组血流动力学变化相似,但麻醉维持期间全身血管阻力下降幅度更大。两组间突破性高血压发生率(分别为44%和43%的患者)和阿芬太尼推注补充次数无差异。缺血、心肌梗死发生率或术后通气时间也无差异。

结论

由于两种输注方式提供的麻醉稳定性相同,阿芬太尼较低的输注方案是更合适的技术。使用该技术,在应激性手术阶段前给予额外的阿芬太尼推注将进一步改善血流动力学稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验