Collard E, Delire V, Mayné A, Jamart J, Louagie Y, Gonzalez M, Ducart A, Broka S, Randour P, Joucken K
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne (Catholic University of Louvain), Yvoir, Belgium.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Dec;10(7):869-76. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80048-6.
To compare intraoperative hemodynamics profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery.
Prospective, randomized study.
University hospital.
Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function.
In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 micrograms, and pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 micrograms/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 micrograms/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 micrograms/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 micrograms) were administered before noxious stimuli. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups.
Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery.
比较丙泊酚 - 阿芬太尼与芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑麻醉用于择期冠状动脉手术时的术中血流动力学特征及恢复特性。
前瞻性随机研究。
大学医院。
50例左心室功能受损或正常的患者。
第1组(n = 25),以3至4毫克/千克/小时的速度输注丙泊酚、500微克阿芬太尼及0.1毫克/千克泮库溴铵诱导麻醉,并用3至6毫克/千克/小时(可变速度)的丙泊酚及30微克/千克/小时(固定速度)的阿芬太尼输注维持麻醉。在有害刺激前给予1毫克阿芬太尼追加剂量;第2组(n = 25)诱导时接受25微克/千克芬太尼、1.5至3毫克咪达唑仑及0.1毫克/千克泮库溴铵的负荷剂量,随后以7微克/千克/小时的速度输注芬太尼维持麻醉。在有害刺激前给予咪达唑仑(1.5至3毫克)及芬太尼(250微克)追加剂量。测量与主要结果:记录八个术中时间点的心血管参数以及拔管时间、吗啡用量和疼痛评分。两组麻醉诱导均伴有平均动脉压小幅但显著下降(第1组:15毫米汞柱(15%);第2组:8毫米汞柱(8%)),心脏指数(第1组:8%;第2组:8%)和左心室每搏功指数(第1组:24%;第2组:21%)也显著下降。在整个手术过程中,除插管后第1组平均动脉压(75±12毫米汞柱)显著低于第2组(89±17毫米汞柱)外,两组血流动力学特征相当。第1组所需的血管活性药物支持较少。第1组拔管时间(7.6小时)比第2组(18.0小时)快。两组间吗啡需求量和疼痛评分相当。
丙泊酚 - 阿芬太尼麻醉可提供良好的术中血流动力学,并允许冠状动脉手术后早期拔管。