Terenghi G
Blond McIndoe Centre, Queen Victoria Hospital, Sussex, UK.
Histol Histopathol. 1995 Jul;10(3):709-18.
The process of nerve regeneration has been studied extensively by traditional morphological methods, but it is only recently that has been possible to identify more precisely the contribution of different nerve subpopulations. By studying different models of nerve repair and regeneration, it is becoming apparent that other tissue components are contributing to the overall process. When muscle grafting is carried out to repair an injured nerve, the regenerating axons are migrating in parallel with Schwann cells to bridge the nerve gap. The presence of Schwann cells is essential for a successful nerve regeneration, most probably because their production of different neuronal trophic factors. This pattern is also repeated when fibronectin mats are used for nerve repair, indicating the possibility to use this new synthetic matrix for clinical application. If the target organ is analysed after nerve repair, the recovery of all nerve components is evident. However, the process occurs at different times in separate skin compartments, and the regeneration of the autonomic innervation appears to be preceded by that of the sensory nerves. When looking at cutaneous nerve regeneration following different type of injury, a common pattern of events becomes apparent. In skin flaps, nerve regeneration begins from the skin surrounding the wound edge, or from the pedicle, and sensory nerves are the first to penetrate into the flap. Angiogenesis precedes reinnervation of the flap, and initially regenerating fibres appear to be associated with newly formed blood vessels. This pattern is evident also in full-thickness wounds and in suction blisters, where only the more superficial cutaneous layer is disrupted. Furthermore, the presence of keratinocytes appears to exert a directional influence on both regenerating blood vessels and nerves, which follow the regenerating keratinocytes when reepidermalisation is taking place. These results would indicate that there is a close relationship between nerve fibres and blood vessels during regeneration, with a substantial contribution to the process from other tissue components and soluble factors from the surrounding environment.
神经再生过程已通过传统形态学方法进行了广泛研究,但直到最近才有可能更精确地确定不同神经亚群的作用。通过研究不同的神经修复和再生模型,越来越明显的是其他组织成分也在参与整个过程。当进行肌肉移植以修复受损神经时,再生轴突与施万细胞平行迁移以桥接神经间隙。施万细胞的存在对于成功的神经再生至关重要,很可能是因为它们产生不同的神经营养因子。当使用纤连蛋白垫进行神经修复时,这种模式也会重复出现,这表明这种新型合成基质有临床应用的可能性。如果在神经修复后分析靶器官,所有神经成分的恢复是明显的。然而,这个过程在不同的皮肤区域发生的时间不同,并且自主神经支配的再生似乎先于感觉神经的再生。当观察不同类型损伤后的皮神经再生时,一个常见的事件模式变得明显。在皮瓣中,神经再生从伤口边缘周围的皮肤或蒂部开始,感觉神经是最先长入皮瓣的。血管生成先于皮瓣的再支配,并且最初再生的纤维似乎与新形成的血管有关。这种模式在全层伤口和抽吸水疱中也很明显,在这些情况下只有较浅的皮肤层受到破坏。此外,角质形成细胞的存在似乎对再生的血管和神经都施加了定向影响,在表皮再生时它们会跟随再生的角质形成细胞。这些结果表明在再生过程中神经纤维和血管之间存在密切关系,其他组织成分和周围环境中的可溶性因子对这个过程有很大贡献。