Mather H M, Elkeles R S
Ealing Hospital, Southall, Middlesex.
BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1060-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1060.
To determine the views of a large and representative group of consultant physicians on the Calman proposals, in which acute general medical services will change from being primarily consultant led to consultant provided.
Postal questionnaires.
All 236 consultant physicians in acute hospitals in North West and South West Thames regions.
Replies were received from 179 (76%). One hundred and thirty seven (77%) indicated that they would not resume emergency residential duties, and 126 (71%) indicated that they would probably withdraw from general medical duties under these circumstances. One hundred and twenty six (70%) and 137 (77%) had not inserted a central venous line or temporary pacemaker, respectively, within the previous five years. Of 157 answering a question on the impact of the Calman proposals on the quality of patient services, 125 considered that it would be detrimental, and only 18 (11%) thought that it would be beneficial.
Most consultant physicians are not prepared to resume emergency duties and could not do so without retraining in practical procedures. There is widespread antagonism to the Calman proposals, and most physicians consider that their impact on the quality of patient services will be detrimental.
确定一大批具有代表性的顾问医师对卡尔曼提案的看法,根据该提案,急性普通医疗服务将从主要由顾问医师主导转变为由顾问医师提供。
邮寄问卷调查。
泰晤士河西北地区和西南地区急症医院的所有236名顾问医师。
收到179份回复(76%)。137人(77%)表示不会恢复紧急住院值班,126人(71%)表示在这种情况下可能会退出普通医疗职责。在过去五年中,分别有126人(70%)和137人(77%)未曾插入中心静脉导管或临时起搏器。在回答关于卡尔曼提案对患者服务质量影响问题的157人中,125人认为这将是有害的,只有18人(11%)认为这将是有益的。
大多数顾问医师不准备恢复紧急值班,而且如果没有进行实际操作的再培训就无法恢复。对卡尔曼提案存在广泛的反对意见,大多数医师认为该提案对患者服务质量将产生不利影响。