Dempsey G A, Skinner A
Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside.
Anaesthesia. 1996 Oct;51(10):975-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14970.x.
We undertook a postal survey to determine the views of all consultant anaesthetists within the North West (Mersey) Regional Health Authority on the Calman proposals for a consultant-based service; replies were received from 110 (84%). Fifty (45%) indicated that they would not resume emergency residential duties, 32 (29%) indicated that they would withdraw from the emergency duty rota, 12 (11%) said they would withdraw/retire from the NHS and 27 (25%) would change hospital under these circumstances. Most consultants had experience in the major anaesthetic sub-specialties within the preceding 5 years (obstetrics 67%, ITU 81%, major trauma 91%). Consequently the need for retraining amongst consultant anaesthetists prior to resuming residential emergency duties would be low. When questioned about the impact on anaesthetic services, 67 (61%) felt the proposals would be detrimental whilst 23 (21%) felt there would be beneficial effects. Most consultants remain antagonistic toward the Calman proposals, with a reluctance to return to residential duties.
我们进行了一项邮寄调查,以确定西北(默西)地区卫生局内所有麻醉科顾问医生对卡尔曼基于顾问医生的服务提议的看法;共收到110份回复(回复率84%)。50人(45%)表示不会恢复紧急住院值班,32人(29%)表示将退出紧急值班轮值表,12人(11%)称将从国民保健制度中退出/退休,27人(25%)表示在这种情况下会更换医院。大多数顾问医生在过去5年内有主要麻醉亚专业的工作经验(产科67%,重症监护室81%,重大创伤91%)。因此,在恢复住院紧急值班之前,麻醉科顾问医生再培训的需求较低。当被问及对麻醉服务的影响时,67人(61%)认为这些提议将产生不利影响,而23人(21%)认为会有有益效果。大多数顾问医生仍然反对卡尔曼提议,不愿恢复住院值班。