Wildemuth B M, Moore M E
School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-3360, USA.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Jul;83(3):294-304.
One hundred sixty-one MEDLINE searches conducted by third-year medical students were analyzed and evaluated to determine which search moves were used, whether those individual moves were effective, and whether there was a relationship between specific search behaviors and the effectiveness of the search strategy as a whole. The typical search included fourteen search statements, used seven terms or "limit" commands, and resulted in the display of eleven citations. The most common moves were selection of a database, entering single-word terms and free-text term phrases, and combining sets of terms. Syntactic errors were also common. Overall, librarians judged the searches to be adequate, and students were quite satisfied with their own searches. However, librarians also identified many missed opportunities in the search strategies, including underutilization of the controlled vocabulary, subheadings, and synonyms for search concepts. No strong relationships were found between specific search behaviors and search effectiveness (as measured by the librarians' or students' evaluations). Implications of these findings for system design and user education are discussed.
对三年级医学生进行的161次医学文献数据库检索(MEDLINE检索)进行了分析和评估,以确定使用了哪些检索步骤、这些单独的步骤是否有效,以及特定检索行为与整个检索策略的有效性之间是否存在关联。典型的检索包括14条检索语句,使用7个检索词或“限定”命令,检索结果显示有11条引用文献。最常见的步骤是选择数据库、输入单个检索词和自由文本检索词短语以及合并检索词集。句法错误也很常见。总体而言,图书馆员认为检索是充分的,学生对自己的检索也相当满意。然而,图书馆员也指出检索策略中存在许多错失的机会,包括对控制词汇、副标题和检索概念同义词的利用不足。未发现特定检索行为与检索效果(由图书馆员或学生的评估衡量)之间存在强关联。讨论了这些发现对系统设计和用户教育的影响。