Malia K, Powell G, Torode S
University of Surrey, UK.
Brain Inj. 1995 Aug-Sep;9(6):607-18. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008219.
A total of 74 brain-injured patients and 46 non-neurological matched controls consecutively admitted to a specialist medical rehabilitation unit were administered the 'Ways of Coping' checklist and the 'Headley Court psychosocial rating scale'. The relatives of all participants were sent the psychosocial rating scale. An analysis of the 'Ways of Coping' checklist showed the brain-injured patients used four strategies for coping, namely problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidance, and wishful thinking. Correlations between these four factors and the responses on the 'Headley Court psychosocial rating scale' showed that less use of emotion-focused, avoidance, and wishful thinking coping strategies predicts better psychosocial functioning in the brain-injured group, a result similar to those reported for a wide variety of other health problems. The implications for treatment and management are discussed.
共有74名脑损伤患者和46名非神经学匹配对照连续入住一家专科医学康复机构,他们接受了“应对方式”清单和“黑德利法院心理社会评定量表”的测试。所有参与者的亲属都收到了心理社会评定量表。对“应对方式”清单的分析表明,脑损伤患者使用了四种应对策略,即问题聚焦、情绪聚焦、回避和如意算盘。这四个因素与“黑德利法院心理社会评定量表”的反应之间的相关性表明,较少使用情绪聚焦、回避和如意算盘应对策略预示着脑损伤组心理社会功能更好,这一结果与针对其他各种健康问题所报告的结果相似。文中讨论了对治疗和管理的启示。