Wahl A, Moum T, Hanestad B R, Wiklund I, Kalfoss M H
Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Qual Life Res. 1999 Aug;8(5):435-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1008995905936.
The aim of the present study was to adapt the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS) to accommodate adult patients with psoriasis. The sample comprised 334 patients who were treated consecutively at three dermatology departments in the eastern Norway. A total number of 273 hospitalised patients (20%) and out-patients (80%) completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 82%. The study assessed the reliability and the face, content and construct validity of the Norwegian version of the JCS. In addition, researchers investigated the most frequently used/effective coping strategies, the relationships between demographic/clinical variables, self-reported physical symptoms and the use of coping strategies. The results (correlational coefficients and interitem alpha s) indicated that there was an overlap in substantive content among the original JCS subscales, due either to measurement error (bias or response style) and/or because the patients in the present study were in a demanding situation in relation to their disease, which may have activated a variety of coping strategies. A factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution (confrontive problem-solving, normalising/optimistic and combined emotive) with satisfactory internal consistency. This factor solution comprised 31 items with an explained variance of 37% of the total pool of items. The most frequently used and effective coping strategies could be labelled as emotion-focused (optimistic/maintain control). Significant correlations were found between age, hospital setting, self-reported physical symptoms and different coping subscales. However, further studies are needed to assess the validity and reliability of the JCS among different population groups in Norway.
本研究的目的是对贾洛维茨应对量表(JCS)进行调整,以适用于成年银屑病患者。样本包括在挪威东部三个皮肤科连续接受治疗的334名患者。共有273名住院患者(20%)和门诊患者(80%)完成了问卷,回复率为82%。该研究评估了挪威版JCS的信度以及表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。此外,研究人员调查了最常用/有效的应对策略、人口统计学/临床变量之间的关系、自我报告的身体症状以及应对策略的使用情况。结果(相关系数和项目间阿尔法系数)表明,原始JCS子量表在实质性内容上存在重叠,这要么是由于测量误差(偏差或反应方式),要么是因为本研究中的患者在疾病方面处于要求苛刻的状况,这可能激活了多种应对策略。因子分析得出了一个三因子解决方案(对抗性问题解决、正常化/乐观和综合情感),具有令人满意的内部一致性。这个因子解决方案包含31个项目,解释方差占项目总数的37%。最常用和有效的应对策略可被归类为以情绪为中心(乐观/保持控制)。在年龄、医院环境、自我报告的身体症状和不同的应对子量表之间发现了显著的相关性。然而,但仍需要进一步的研究来评估JCS在挪威不同人群中的效度和信度。