• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The NIH consensus development program.

作者信息

Ferguson J H

机构信息

Office of Medical Applications of Research (OMAR), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Jul;21(7):332-6. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30157-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30157-2
PMID:7581735
Abstract

The NIH CDCs are a highly visible, public forum to evaluate controversial medical technologies by synthesizing current medical science data. The consensus statements, although not intended as medical practice guidelines, may form part of the database preceding guideline formulation. It is difficult to assess the effect of the conferences on physician practice, in part reflecting the interference of the many other influences, medical and nonmedical, on physician behavior. Yet the program has had some success in influencing reimbursement policy for some technologies here and abroad and in influencing specialty organization policy, thereby indirectly affecting physician behavior. On the other hand, OMAR's dissemination activities have apparently been so successful that demand for CDC statements has more than doubled over the past five years, prompting OMAR to establish an information service (including fax and the Internet). And finally, the program has spawned consensus conferences throughout the world, including Canada, Western Europe, and Israel (Goodman & Baratz 1990).

摘要

相似文献

1
The NIH consensus development program.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Jul;21(7):332-6. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30157-2.
2
Impact of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on stimulating National Institutes of Health-funded research, 1998 to 2001.1998年至2001年美国国立卫生研究院共识发展项目对推动国立卫生研究院资助研究的影响
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Summer;23(3):343-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462307070511.
3
Technology assessment in health care: group process and decision theory.
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Mar-Apr;22(3-4):183-90.
4
The NIH Consensus Development Program. The evolution of guidelines.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Summer;12(3):460-74.
5
NIH consensus conferences: dissemination and impact.美国国立卫生研究院共识会议:传播与影响
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:180-98; discussion 198-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26348.x.
6
Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations.光说不做?共识性推荐意见的制定、传播及影响
Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:41-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.000353.
7
The technology assessment and practice guidelines forum. A modified group judgment method.技术评估与实践指南论坛。一种改良的群体判断方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Spring;8(2):289-300. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300013507.
8
Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives.不同国家的共识会议。目标与观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(2):305-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300004104.
9
Health Services Technology/Assessment Text (HSTAT).
Med Ref Serv Q. 1995 Fall;14(3):39-43. doi: 10.1300/J115V14N03_04.
10
The American and Canadian consensus conferences on dementia: is there consensus?美国和加拿大关于痴呆症的共识会议:存在共识吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Aug;41(8):883-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06190.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Promise and perils of guidelines in quality cancer care.高质量癌症护理指南的承诺与风险。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):354-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000618. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
2
[Consensus methods: review of original methods and their main alternatives used in public health].[共识方法:对公共卫生领域中原始方法及其主要替代方法的综述]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2008 Dec;56(6):415-23. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
The emergence of clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南的出现。
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):691-727. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x.
4
A controlled "before-after" study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice.一项对照“前后”研究:临床指南项目和区域癌症网络组织对医疗实践的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2002 Feb 1;86(3):313-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600057.