Suppr超能文献

胎盘娩出方法对术中失血的比较。

The comparison of placental removal methods on operative blood loss.

作者信息

Waqar Fareesa, Nasar Razia, Fawad Anisa

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, *Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad.

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):3-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On an average 1 litre of blood is lost during Caesarean Section. Many variable techniques have been tried to reduce this blood loss. Many study trials have shown the spontaneous delivery of placenta method to be superior over manual method because of reduced intra operative blood loss and reduced incidence of post operative endometritis. The main objective of our study was to compare the risk of blood loss associated with spontaneous and manual removal of the placenta during caesarean section.

STUDY DESIGN

Quasi Experimental. SETTING AND DURATION OF STUDY: September 2004 to September 2005, a 13 months study at Islamic International Medical Complex Islamabad.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Islamic International Medical Complex, Islamabad from September 2004 to September 2005. All Women undergoing elective or emergency caesarean section were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy below 37 weeks, severe maternal anaemia, and prolonged rupture of the membranes with fever, placenta praevia, placenta accreta and clotting disorders. Patients were allocated to the two groups randomly. Group A comprised of women in whom the obstetrician waited a maximum of 5 minutes till the placenta delivered spontaneously. In group B the obstetrician manually cleaved out the placenta as soon as the infant was delivered. The primary outcome measures noted were difference in haemoglobin of >2 gm/dl (preoperatively and postoperatively), time interval between delivery of baby and placenta, significant blood loss (>1000 cc), additional use of oxytocics, total operating time and blood transfusions. Data was analysed by SPSS. Statistical tests used for specific comparison were chi2-test and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-five patients were allocated to two groups randomly. Seventy-eight patients were allocated to group A and 67 patients allocated to group B. Mean maternal age, birth weight, and total operating time were the same in two groups, but blood loss as measured by a difference in haemoglobin of greater then 2 grams/dl was statistically significant. Significant blood loss (>1000 cc) and time interval between delivery of infant and placenta were also statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous delivery of placenta has significant reduction of blood loss as compared to manual removal at caesarean section.

摘要

背景

剖宫产过程中平均失血1升。人们尝试了多种不同技术来减少这种失血量。许多研究试验表明,胎盘自然娩出法优于人工剥离法,因为术中失血量减少,且术后子宫内膜炎的发生率降低。我们研究的主要目的是比较剖宫产时胎盘自然娩出和人工剥离相关的失血风险。

研究设计

准实验性研究。研究地点及持续时间:2004年9月至2005年9月,在伊斯兰堡国际医疗中心进行了为期13个月的研究。

患者和方法

本研究于2004年9月至2005年在伊斯兰堡国际医疗中心妇产科进行。所有接受择期或急诊剖宫产的妇女均纳入研究。排除标准为孕周小于37周、严重母体贫血、胎膜早破伴发热、前置胎盘、胎盘植入和凝血功能障碍。患者被随机分配到两组。A组由产科医生最多等待5分钟直至胎盘自然娩出的妇女组成。B组中,婴儿一娩出产科医生就手动剥离胎盘。记录的主要结局指标为血红蛋白下降>2克/分升(术前和术后)、婴儿与胎盘娩出的时间间隔、大量失血(>1000毫升)、催产素的额外使用、总手术时间和输血情况。数据采用SPSS进行分析。用于特定比较的统计检验为卡方检验和学生t检验。

结果

145例患者被随机分配到两组。78例患者被分配到A组,67例患者被分配到B组。两组的平均产妇年龄、出生体重和总手术时间相同,但以血红蛋白下降大于2克/分升衡量的失血量在统计学上有显著差异。两组之间大量失血(>1000毫升)以及婴儿与胎盘娩出的时间间隔在统计学上也有显著差异。

结论

与剖宫产时人工剥离胎盘相比,胎盘自然娩出可显著减少失血量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验