说谎的妈妈还是狡猾的爸爸？儿童监护权/性虐待指控纠纷中的一些棘手问题。
Mendacious moms or devious dads? Some perplexing issues in child custody/sexual abuse allegation disputes.
作者信息
Penfold P S
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia.
出版信息
Can J Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;40(6):337-41. doi: 10.1177/070674379504000610.
OBJECTIVE
To explore relevant literature about sexual abuse allegations arising in child custody disputes.
METHOD
A literature review of false allegations is given and the contribution of gender bias to this issue is discussed. The role a child psychiatrist may play in such cases is outlined.
RESULTS
Contrary to much popular and professional opinion, sexual abuse allegations are found in only 2% of child custody disputes, and, of these, 8% to 16.5% are false. While false allegations arise for a variety of reasons, the word "false" can imply both erroneous and deceitful activities. This ambiguity, along with gender bias, may lead to disbelief of, and blame towards, parents who report sexual abuse in the context of a dispute about custody or access.
CONCLUSION
The child psychiatrist who testifies in such custody disputes should have caution, humility, and an open mind both in the courtroom and in dealing with other professionals working in this area.
目的
探讨有关儿童监护权纠纷中出现的性虐待指控的相关文献。
方法
对虚假指控进行文献综述，并讨论性别偏见对该问题的影响。概述了儿童精神科医生在此类案件中可能发挥的作用。
结果
与许多大众和专业观点相反，在仅2%的儿童监护权纠纷中发现了性虐待指控，其中8%至16.5%是虚假的。虽然虚假指控产生的原因多种多样，但“虚假”一词可能既意味着错误行为，也意味着欺骗行为。这种模糊性，连同性别偏见，可能导致对在监护权或探视权纠纷背景下报告性虐待的父母产生不信任和指责。
结论
在这类监护权纠纷中作证的儿童精神科医生在法庭上以及与该领域其他专业人员打交道时都应保持谨慎、谦逊和开放的心态。
Zotero 插件