• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉搭桥手术的最佳时机

Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Braxton J H, Hammond G L, Letsou G V, Franco K L, Kopf G S, Elefteriades J A, Baldwin J C

机构信息

Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06520, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9 Suppl):II66-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.66.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.92.9.66
PMID:7586463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess optimal timing for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all patients undergoing CABG without associated procedures at our institution from January 1, 1991, to July 30, 1992, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on time from infarct to revascularization. The control group consisted of patients operated on for angina refractory to medical management. Relative risks (incident infarction group divided by incident control group) were established for need of vasopressors, new balloon to separate from bypass, perioperative myocardial infarction, and hospital mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients underwent CABG within 6 weeks of infarction. In the experimental group, 58 patients underwent CABG for non-Q-wave infarction, and 58 patients underwent CABG for Q-wave infarction. In the control group, 255 patients underwent surgery for angina without infarction. Patients were analyzed by group relative to the time between infarction and CABG. Patients were analyzed between infarction and CABG and assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 patients were revascularized within 48 hours; group 2, between 3 and 5 days; and group 3, after 5 days. Significance was determined by Fisher's exact or Mantel-Haenszel chi 2 test where appropriate. Multivariate analysis was performed on statistics that were significant. All patients within all groups after Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction had a significantly higher risk of needing an intra-aortic balloon pump and vasopressors to be weaned from bypass and a greater incidence of perioperative MI compared with control patients. Surgical mortality is highest immediately after Q-wave infarctions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-Q-wave infarction may undergo CABG relatively safely at any time. Acceptable timing for CABG after Q-wave infarction is after 48 hours.

摘要

背景

为评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的最佳时机,我们回顾了1991年1月1日至1992年7月30日在我院接受CABG且无相关手术的所有患者。根据从梗死到血运重建的时间将患者分为三组。对照组由因药物治疗无效的心绞痛而接受手术的患者组成。确定了血管升压药需求、新球囊与旁路分离、围手术期心肌梗死和医院死亡率的相对风险(梗死事件组除以对照事件组)。

方法与结果

116例患者在梗死6周内接受了CABG。在实验组中,58例患者因非Q波梗死接受CABG,58例患者因Q波梗死接受CABG。在对照组中,255例患者因心绞痛而无梗死接受手术。根据梗死与CABG之间的时间对患者进行分组分析。在梗死与CABG之间对患者进行分析,并将其分为三组之一。第1组患者在48小时内进行血运重建;第2组在3至5天之间;第3组在5天后。在适当情况下,通过Fisher精确检验或Mantel-Haenszel卡方检验确定显著性。对具有显著性的统计数据进行多变量分析。与对照组患者相比,所有组中Q波或非Q波心肌梗死后的所有患者需要主动脉内球囊泵和血管升压药以脱离旁路的风险显著更高,围手术期心肌梗死的发生率更高。Q波梗死后立即手术死亡率最高。

结论

非Q波梗死患者可在任何时间相对安全地接受CABG。Q波梗死后CABG的可接受时机是在48小时后。

相似文献

1
Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉搭桥手术的最佳时机
Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9 Suppl):II66-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.66.
2
Clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary artery stenting for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Initial results with a balloon-expandable, stainless steel design.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术后急性或濒临闭塞行冠状动脉支架置入术的临床及血管造影结果。球囊扩张式不锈钢设计的初步结果。
Circulation. 1993 Nov;88(5 Pt 1):2086-96. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2086.
3
The efficacy of medical stabilization prior to myocardial revascularization in early refractory postinfarction angina.心肌血运重建术前医学稳定治疗对早期难治性心肌梗死后心绞痛的疗效。
Ann Surg. 1983 Jan;197(1):91-8.
4
Revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Jul;60(1):19-26.
5
Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者在进行外科心肌血运重建术前的预防性主动脉内球囊反搏。
Perfusion. 2018 Jul;33(5):390-400. doi: 10.1177/0267659118760384. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
6
Comparison of outcome of patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction with and without prior coronary artery bypass grafting (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia III Registry).不稳定型心绞痛和非Q波急性心肌梗死患者有无冠状动脉旁路移植术史的预后比较(心肌缺血溶栓治疗III登记研究)
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Feb 1;77(4):227-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89383-6.
7
Myocardial revascularisation after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后的心肌血运重建
Int J Cardiol. 1999 May 15;69(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(99)00030-3.
8
The effect of previous coronary-artery bypass surgery on the prognosis of patients with diabetes who have acute myocardial infarction. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Investigators.既往冠状动脉搭桥手术对患有急性心肌梗死的糖尿病患者预后的影响。搭桥血管成形术血运重建研究调查组。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 6;342(14):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004063421401.
9
Intra-aortic balloon pumping in coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病中的主动脉内球囊反搏
Herz. 1979 Oct;4(5):397-409.
10
Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines).非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间冠状动脉旁路移植术的时间来自国家心血管数据注册中心 ACTION 注册研究-GWTG(急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结局网络注册研究-遵循指南)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr;3(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting during Hospitalization for ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST 段抬高或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间行冠状动脉旁路移植术的特征和院内转归。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan 25;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00016. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Appropriate Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Meta-Analysis.急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的合适时机:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 28;9:794925. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.794925. eCollection 2022.
3
Revascularization Strategies for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的血运重建策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Apr 10;21(5):39. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1125-9.
4
Does Preoperative Troponin Level Impact Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?术前肌钙蛋白水平是否影响冠状动脉旁路移植术后的结局?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.085. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Current outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from real world practice.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的当前疗效:来自真实世界实践的证据。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(Suppl 10):S772-S786. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.102.
6
Timing of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and postoperative outcomes.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉搭桥手术的时机及术后结局
Arch Med Sci. 2016 Aug 1;12(4):766-71. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.40546. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
Does early coronary artery bypass surgery improve survival in non-ST acute myocardial infarction?早期冠状动脉搭桥手术能否提高非ST段急性心肌梗死患者的生存率?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):140-2. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt128.
8
Long term results of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: propensity score matching analysis.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的长期结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Feb;27(2):153-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.2.153. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
[Coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes].冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗急性冠状动脉综合征
Herz. 2010 Mar;35(2):70-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3327-1.
10
Timing of bypass surgery in stable patients after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后稳定患者搭桥手术的时机选择。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23(12):976-82. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70860-7.