McDonnell M A, Kralios A C, Tsagaris T J, Kuida H
Am Heart J. 1979 Jan;97(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90117-0.
In this preparation counterpulsation effect was found equivalent to 42 +/- 7% of complete left ventricular bypass before, and 46 +/- 9% post-coronary occlusion. We conclude that counterpulsation is effective mainly by reducing a major determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption, i.e., afterload, whereas left ventricular bypass by reducing primarily preload results in secondary afterload reduction when peripheral resistance is unchanged. At the higher left ventricular bypass levels, reduction of myocardial oxygen consumption is far greater than during balloon counterpulsation. Acute functional loss of myocardium does not alter the effect of these assist methods regarding the reduction of myocardial oxygen consumption. Whether selection of either method for clinical application should be made only on the basis of its capability for reduction of myocardial oxygen consumption remains to be justified by conclusive demonstration of beneficial effect of reduction of myocardial oxygen consumption in the specific circulatory disorders.
在此准备过程中,发现反搏效果相当于冠状动脉闭塞前完全左心室旁路的42±7%,冠状动脉闭塞后为46±9%。我们得出结论,反搏主要通过降低心肌耗氧量的一个主要决定因素(即后负荷)来发挥作用,而左心室旁路主要通过降低前负荷,在周围阻力不变时导致继发性后负荷降低。在较高的左心室旁路水平,心肌耗氧量的降低远大于球囊反搏期间。心肌的急性功能丧失并不改变这些辅助方法在降低心肌耗氧量方面的效果。对于临床应用中选择这两种方法中的任何一种是否仅应基于其降低心肌耗氧量的能力,仍有待通过在特定循环障碍中降低心肌耗氧量有益效果的确凿证明来证实。