• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科医生参与剖宫产手术。

Paediatrician attendance at caesarean section.

作者信息

Ng P C, Wong M Y, Nelson E A

机构信息

Medical College, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 1995 Aug;154(8):672-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02079075.

DOI:10.1007/BF02079075
PMID:7588972
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Five hundred and twenty term singleton infants delivered by Caesarean section were categorised into six groups according to type of Caesarean section (elective or emergency), type of anaesthesia (epidural or general) and presence of fetal distress. Infants delivered under general anaesthesia had a significantly higher incidence of respiratory depression at birth with Apgar scores < 7 at both 1 and 5 min (P < 0.00001), greater need for active resuscitation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation or bag and mask ventilation) (P < 0.000001) and a higher rate of neonatal unit admission (P < 0.00001). Caesarean sections for fetal distress were associated with a significantly higher incidence of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, but not bag and mask ventilation, for both the general anaesthesia and epidural groups (P < 0.003 and P < 0.02 respectively), indicating severe respiratory depression in some cases. Under epidural anaesthesia, both elective section and emergency section without fetal distress were low risk deliveries. By excluding the non-cephalic presentation cases in these two groups, the incidence of infants requiring active resuscitation was equivalent to the incidence quoted for spontaneous normal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Attendance by a paediatrician is not routinely required at epidural Caesarean section when the infant is cephalic and when there is no fetal distress. Every effort should be made to ensure that epidural anaesthesia is provided in preference to general anaesthesia.

摘要

未标注

520例足月单胎剖宫产分娩的婴儿,根据剖宫产类型(择期或急诊)、麻醉类型(硬膜外或全身)和胎儿窘迫情况分为六组。全身麻醉下分娩的婴儿出生时呼吸抑制的发生率显著更高,1分钟和5分钟时阿氏评分均<7(P<0.00001),更需要积极复苏(间歇性正压通气或面罩气囊通气)(P<0.000001),新生儿入住新生儿病房的比例更高(P<0.00001)。对于全身麻醉组和硬膜外麻醉组,因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产与间歇性正压通气的发生率显著更高相关,但面罩气囊通气的发生率无显著差异(分别为P<0.003和P<0.02),表明在某些情况下存在严重呼吸抑制。在硬膜外麻醉下,择期剖宫产和无胎儿窘迫的急诊剖宫产均为低风险分娩。通过排除这两组中的非头先露病例,需要积极复苏的婴儿发生率与自然正常分娩所引用的发生率相当。

结论

当婴儿为头先露且无胎儿窘迫时,硬膜外麻醉剖宫产通常不需要儿科医生在场。应尽一切努力确保优先采用硬膜外麻醉而非全身麻醉。

相似文献

1
Paediatrician attendance at caesarean section.儿科医生参与剖宫产手术。
Eur J Pediatr. 1995 Aug;154(8):672-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02079075.
2
Attendance of paediatricians at elective Caesarean sections performed under regional anaesthesia: is it warranted?儿科医生参与在区域麻醉下进行的择期剖宫产手术:是否有必要?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Jun;42(6):332-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00886.x.
3
Epidural versus general anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Effect on Apgar score and acid-base status of the newborn.择期剖宫产硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉对比:对新生儿阿氏评分及酸碱状态的影响
Anaesthesia. 1989 Sep;44(9):778-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09271.x.
4
The influence of the mode of anaesthesia in the incidence of neonatal morbidity after an elective caesarean section.择期剖宫产术后麻醉方式对新生儿发病率的影响。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2006;33(1):10-2.
5
Retrospective cohort study of decision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes according to the type of anaesthesia for code-red emergency caesarean sections in a tertiary care obstetric unit in France.法国一家三级产科单位中,因红色代码紧急剖宫产而采用不同麻醉类型的情况下,从决策到分娩的时间间隔与新生儿结局的回顾性队列研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Dec;38(6):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Do all deliveries with elective caesarean section need paediatrician attendance?所有择期剖宫产分娩都需要儿科医生在场吗?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Dec;25(12):2766-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.703722. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
7
Is a paediatrician needed at all Caesarean sections?所有剖宫产都需要儿科医生在场吗?
J Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Jun;34(3):241-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1998.00207.x.
8
Determinants of paediatrician's presence at Caesarian section.儿科医生出席剖宫产手术的决定因素。
West Afr J Med. 2012 Jan-Mar;31(1):24-7.
9
Is a paediatrician required at caesarean section?剖宫产时需要儿科医生在场吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987 Sep;26(1):91-3. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(87)90012-8.
10
Comparison of epidural and general anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery according to the effects of apgar scores and acid-base status.根据阿普加评分和酸碱状态的影响比较硬膜外麻醉和全身麻醉用于择期剖宫产的效果
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Nov;39(4):464-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03134.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of general and epidural anesthesia upon neonatal Apgar scores in repeat cesarean section.全身麻醉和硬膜外麻醉对再次剖宫产新生儿阿氏评分的影响。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Nov;155(5):641-5.
2
Should a paediatrician be present at non-rotational forceps deliveries?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Sep;91(9):899-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb03705.x.
3
Which deliveries require paediatricians in attendance?哪些分娩需要儿科医生在场?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jul 7;289(6436):16-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6436.16.
4
Is a paediatrician required at caesarean section?剖宫产时需要儿科医生在场吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987 Sep;26(1):91-3. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(87)90012-8.