Suppr超能文献

所有剖宫产都需要儿科医生在场吗?

Is a paediatrician needed at all Caesarean sections?

作者信息

Parsons S J, Sonneveld S, Nolan T

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Children's Health Center of Northern Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Jun;34(3):241-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1998.00207.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The need for a skilled neonatal resuscitator in the form of a paediatrician or paediatric registrar to attend a vaginal delivery or Caesarean section (CS) is not clearly defined. This study was undertaken in order to ascertain the level of resuscitation a neonate might require dependent on the delivery mode and type of anaesthesia used.

METHODOLOGY

We analysed the Tasmanian Obstetric Audit from 1980 to 1989 for the need for intubation and Apgar scores at 1 min of term singleton deliveries by the mode of delivery.

RESULTS

The number of singleton term deliveries was 64739. When the data were analysed annually there was a trend for a reduction in the need for intubation in CS deliveries during the first 5 years, although this was not paralleled by an improvement in Apgar scores. Thus the intubation rate data are also presented for the last 5 years of the study. The intubation rate, Apgar score at 1 min of < 4, and Apgar score at 1 min of > or = 4 < 7 for repeat CS under epidural anaesthesia were 0.55% (0.26% for 1985-89) 0.83% and 3.58%, respectively, with relative risks when compared with spontaneous normal vaginal delivery of 1.8 (1.2 for 1985-89), 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The relative risk of these outcomes was higher than for normal vaginal delivery for all other modes of delivery including repeat CS under general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that a paediatrician or paediatric registrar is not required to routinely attend repeat CS under epidural anaesthesia, but should be present for repeat CS under general anaesthesia.

摘要

目的

对于由儿科医生或儿科住院医师作为熟练的新生儿复苏人员参与阴道分娩或剖宫产(CS)的需求尚无明确定义。开展本研究以确定根据分娩方式和所用麻醉类型新生儿可能需要的复苏水平。

方法

我们分析了1980年至1989年塔斯马尼亚产科审计中足月单胎分娩按分娩方式在出生1分钟时的插管需求和阿氏评分。

结果

足月单胎分娩数量为64739例。每年分析数据时,在前5年剖宫产分娩的插管需求有减少趋势,尽管阿氏评分并未相应改善。因此,也给出了研究最后5年的插管率数据。硬膜外麻醉下再次剖宫产的插管率、出生1分钟时阿氏评分<4以及出生1分钟时阿氏评分>或=4<7分别为0.55%(1985 - 89年为0.26%)、0.83%和3.58%,与自然正常阴道分娩相比相对风险分别为1.8(1985 - 89年为1.2)、0.7和0.5。包括全麻下再次剖宫产在内的所有其他分娩方式,这些结局的相对风险均高于正常阴道分娩。

结论

得出的结论是,硬膜外麻醉下再次剖宫产时不需要儿科医生或儿科住院医师常规在场,但全麻下再次剖宫产时应在场。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验