• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痊愈:医疗保健改革的内部游说,第一部分。公共诚信中心。

Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part I. Center for Public Integrity.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(3):411-53. doi: 10.2190/2MWC-6T9W-QYFE-K1FT.

DOI:10.2190/2MWC-6T9W-QYFE-K1FT
PMID:7591374
Abstract

The Center for Public Integrity conducted a year-long investigation of the decision-making processes of the U.S. government during its work on health care reform. The results suggest that health care reform has become the most heavily lobbied legislative initiative in recent U.S. history. In 1993 and 1994, hundreds of special interests spent over $100 million to influence the outcome of this public policy issue. In Part I, following a summary of the study and an introduction explaining the methodology, the authors provide a brief history of other health care reform efforts attempted in this century and examine the evolution of the Clinton plan, from its inception through the task force process to its release.

摘要

公共诚信中心对美国政府在医疗改革工作中的决策过程进行了为期一年的调查。结果表明,医疗改革已成为美国近代史上游说活动最为密集的立法举措。1993年和1994年,数百个特殊利益集团花费超过1亿美元来影响这一公共政策问题的结果。在第一部分,作者在总结研究并介绍方法论之后,简要回顾了本世纪其他医疗改革努力的历史,并考察了克林顿计划从构思到通过特别工作组流程直至发布的演变过程。

相似文献

1
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part I. Center for Public Integrity.痊愈:医疗保健改革的内部游说,第一部分。公共诚信中心。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(3):411-53. doi: 10.2190/2MWC-6T9W-QYFE-K1FT.
2
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part II. Center for Public Integrity.
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(4):593-632. doi: 10.2190/0LP1-2EAM-3QJM-R8DT.
3
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part III.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):19-46. doi: 10.2190/E90X-YLKC-B90U-0WYG.
4
Clinton plan takes shape, but financing still big unknown.
Health Care Reform Week. 1993 Jun 14;22(23):1-8.
5
Managed health care companies' lobbying frenzy.管理式医疗保健公司的游说热潮。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(3):403-10. doi: 10.2190/G11P-26YF-DQ6J-EKHV.
6
Health care lobbying in the United States.美国的医疗保健游说活动。
Am J Med. 2004 Apr 1;116(7):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.037.
7
Foreword: health care reform in the United States--the Presidential Task Force.前言:美国的医疗保健改革——总统特别工作组
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(1-2):1-20.
8
Lobbyists want to limit federal intervention in health care.游说者希望限制联邦政府对医疗保健的干预。
Bus Health. 1992 Sep 15;10(11):46-9.
9
Where should the buck stop: federal and state responsibilities in health care financing reform.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:87-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.87.
10
Health care reform, the American way.美国式医疗改革。
J Med Assoc Ga. 1993 Dec;82(12):674.

引用本文的文献

1
Interrogating scarcity: how to think about 'resource-scarce settings'.探讨匮乏:如何思考“资源匮乏环境”
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jul;28(4):400-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs071. Epub 2012 Aug 16.