• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part III.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):19-46. doi: 10.2190/E90X-YLKC-B90U-0WYG.

DOI:10.2190/E90X-YLKC-B90U-0WYG
PMID:8932600
Abstract

The Center for Public Integrity conducted a year-long investigation of the decision-making processes of the U.S. government during its work on health care reform. The results suggest that health care reform has become the most heavily lobbied legislative initiative in recent U.S. history. In 1993 and 1994, hundreds of special interests spent over $100 million to influence the outcome of this public policy issue. In Part III, the authors conclude their description of these special interests, including political organizations, the elderly, labor, and public interest groups and foundations. The report concludes with a discussion of how the work of Congress is influenced by political contributions to individual members of Congress and to the Democratic and Republican parties, trips sponsored by the health care industry, and investments held by members of Congress in health care-related industries.

摘要

相似文献

1
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part III.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):19-46. doi: 10.2190/E90X-YLKC-B90U-0WYG.
2
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part II. Center for Public Integrity.
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(4):593-632. doi: 10.2190/0LP1-2EAM-3QJM-R8DT.
3
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part I. Center for Public Integrity.痊愈:医疗保健改革的内部游说,第一部分。公共诚信中心。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(3):411-53. doi: 10.2190/2MWC-6T9W-QYFE-K1FT.
4
Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation.烟草控制立法失败的流行病学研究。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1171-5.
5
Stress fractures.
Natl J (Wash). 1994 Feb 19;26(8):412-7.
6
The politics of health care reform in the United States, 1992-1994: a historical review.1992 - 1994年美国医疗保健改革的政治:历史回顾
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(2):185-201. doi: 10.2190/5GMF-CPYE-N8G4-7HH4.
7
Health reform impasse: the politics of American ambivalence toward government.医疗改革僵局:美国对政府矛盾态度的政治因素
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Fall;18(3 Pt 2):629-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-3-629.
8
Lobbying Expenditures and Campaign Contributions by the Pharmaceutical and Health Product Industry in the United States, 1999-2018.美国制药和保健品行业 1999-2018 年的游说支出和竞选捐款。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):688-697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0146.
9
Dealing with the conflict of interests in health care reform.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1998 Fall;21(2):162-80.
10
Perspectives. All together now--Congress seeks elusive reform compromise in '94.
Faulkner Grays Med Health. 1994 Jan 24;48(4):suppl 6 p..

引用本文的文献

1
Interrogating scarcity: how to think about 'resource-scarce settings'.探讨匮乏:如何思考“资源匮乏环境”
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jul;28(4):400-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs071. Epub 2012 Aug 16.