• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥氮平3770、阿米替林和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究。

A double-blind comparison of Org 3770, amitriptyline, and placebo in major depression.

作者信息

Bremner J D

机构信息

Bremner Research Institute, Olympia, WA 98502, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Nov;56(11):519-25.

PMID:7592505
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A 6-week, double-blind, dose titration study was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the new antidepressant Org 3770 in comparison with amitriptyline and placebo.

METHOD

One hundred fifty outpatients of both sexes, 18 years and older, with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depressive episode, were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with Org 3770, amitriptyline, or placebo.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores of all treatment groups were higher than 25, thus indicating that a large proportion of severely depressed patients entered the study. The overall mean daily doses were 22 mg/day for Org 3770, 133 mg/day for amitriptyline, and 4.9 capsules/day for placebo. The majority of times assessments were made, both active drugs produced significantly greater improvements than placebo on all efficacy variables (17-item HAM-D, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions, and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale). After 6 weeks of treatment, significantly greater (p < or = .05) proportions of patients in both active treatment groups (70% in the Org 3770- and 58% in the amitriptyline-treatment groups) than in the placebo-treatment group (33%) were HAM-D responders. Org 3770 was well tolerated in this study; dry mouth and somnolence were the only adverse experiences that occurred significantly more frequently with Org 3770- than with placebo-treated patients. By contrast, treatment with amitriptyline was related to significantly higher rates of dry mouth, constipation, and dyspepsia as compared with both Org 3770 and placebo, and significantly higher rates of somnolence as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In this study, Org 3770 was as effective as amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression, with advantages regarding improvements of depressed mood (HAM-D Item 1), responder rates, and safety.

摘要

背景

开展了一项为期6周的双盲剂量滴定研究,以评估新型抗抑郁药Org 3770与阿米替林及安慰剂相比的疗效和安全性。

方法

150名年龄在18岁及以上、被诊断为DSM-III重度抑郁发作的门诊患者,随机分配接受为期6周的Org 3770、阿米替林或安慰剂治疗。

结果

在基线时,所有治疗组的17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)平均得分均高于25分,这表明很大比例的重度抑郁患者进入了该研究。Org 3770的总体日均剂量为22毫克/天,阿米替林为133毫克/天,安慰剂为4.9粒胶囊/天。在大多数评估时间点,两种活性药物在所有疗效变量(17项HAM-D、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、临床总体印象和zung自评抑郁量表)上的改善均显著优于安慰剂。治疗6周后,两个活性治疗组(Org 3770治疗组为70%,阿米替林治疗组为58%)中HAM-D反应者的比例显著高于安慰剂治疗组(33%)(p≤0.05)。在本研究中,Org 3770耐受性良好;口干和嗜睡是仅有的在接受Org 3770治疗的患者中比接受安慰剂治疗的患者更频繁出现的不良体验。相比之下,与Org 3770和安慰剂相比,阿米替林治疗导致口干、便秘和消化不良的发生率显著更高,与安慰剂相比,嗜睡发生率显著更高。

结论

在本研究中,Org 3770在治疗重度抑郁症方面与阿米替林同样有效,在改善抑郁情绪(HAM-D第1项)、反应率和安全性方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
A double-blind comparison of Org 3770, amitriptyline, and placebo in major depression.奥氮平3770、阿米替林和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Nov;56(11):519-25.
2
Mirtazapine vs. amitriptyline vs. placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder.米氮平与阿米替林及安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的对比研究
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(2):191-6.
3
A meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety.一项关于米氮平治疗重度抑郁症及焦虑症状患者的八项随机、双盲、对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;59(3):123-7.
4
A controlled study of mianserin in moderately to severely depressed outpatients.米安色林治疗中度至重度门诊抑郁症患者的对照研究。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27(2):135-9.
5
Double-blind comparison of bupropion and fluoxetine in depressed outpatients.安非他酮与氟西汀治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;52(8):329-35.
6
Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.经颅磁刺激可加速阿米替林对重度抑郁症的抗抑郁作用:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 15;57(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.029.
7
Paroxetine versus placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients.帕罗西汀与安慰剂对比:抑郁症患者的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;53(12):434-8.
8
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.混合安非他明盐缓释剂(阿得拉XR)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):266-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011.
9
Gepirone extended-release: new evidence for efficacy in the treatment of major depressive disorder.戈吡酯缓释片:治疗重度抑郁症有效性的新证据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;64(3):243-9.
10
Gepirone extended-release treatment of anxious depression: evidence from a retrospective subgroup analysis in patients with major depressive disorder.阿吡哌隆缓释剂治疗伴焦虑的抑郁症:来自重度抑郁症患者回顾性亚组分析的证据
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;65(8):1069-75.

引用本文的文献

1
The risks of adverse events with mirtazapine for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.米氮平治疗重度抑郁症成人患者的不良事件风险:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06396-6.
2
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.三环类抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的有益和有害作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e300730. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730.
3
Amitriptyline's anticholinergic adverse drug reactions-A systematic multiple-indication review and meta-analysis.
阿米替林的抗胆碱能药物不良反应——系统多适应证综述和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0284168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284168. eCollection 2023.
4
The Effect of Antidepressants on Depression After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis.抗抑郁药对创伤性脑损伤后抑郁的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 May/Jun;34(3):E47-E54. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000439.
5
Amitriptyline and Sexual Function: A Systematic Review Updated for Sexual Health Practice.阿米替林与性功能:为性健康实践更新的系统评价
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Mar;12(2):370-379. doi: 10.1177/1557988317734519. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
Enhanced anti-immobility effects of Sanggenon G isolated from the root bark of Morus alba combined with the α2-antagonist yohimbine in the rat forced swim test.从桑白皮中分离出的桑根酮G与α2拮抗剂育亨宾联合使用对大鼠强迫游泳试验抗不动效应的增强作用。
J Nat Med. 2016 Jul;70(3):679-82. doi: 10.1007/s11418-016-0975-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.抗抑郁药疗效试验出版物中精神科纳入和排除标准描述的问题:定性综述及提高清晰度的建议
CNS Drugs. 2016 Mar;30(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0314-y.
8
Mirtazapine : A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential in the Management of Major Depression.米氮平:其药理学及在重度抑郁症治疗中的潜在应用综述
CNS Drugs. 1996 May;5(5):389-402. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199605050-00007.
9
Mirtazapine has a therapeutic potency in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced mice model of Parkinson's disease.米氮平在 1-甲基-4-苯基-1,2,3,6-四氢吡啶(MPTP)诱导的帕金森病小鼠模型中具有治疗效力。
BMC Neurosci. 2014 Jun 25;15:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-79.
10
A review of therapeutic uses of mirtazapine in psychiatric and medical conditions.米氮平在精神疾病和躯体疾病中的治疗用途综述。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(5). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13r01525. Epub 2013 Oct 10.