Power T J, Hess L E, Bennett D S
Division of Child Development and Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1995 Aug;16(4):238-43.
The acceptability of behavioral and pharmacological interventions for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among elementary and middle school teachers was examined. Teachers (n = 147) from four suburban school districts read vignettes depicting the use of two behavioral interventions (i.e., daily report and a response cost procedure) and the use of psychostimulant medication in the treatment of ADHD and then rated the acceptability of each. Teachers' ratings of acceptability were examined as a function of knowledge of ADHD and level of teaching experience. Results demonstrated that elementary and middle school teachers each rated daily report as significantly more acceptable than response cost and stimulant medication. Also, teachers rated medication as more acceptable when used in combination with behavioral interventions than when used in isolation. Knowledge of ADHD and years of teaching experience generally were unrelated to ratings of acceptability. Cluster analyses demonstrated that teachers can be differentiated into several profile types with regard to their perceptions of treatment acceptability.
本研究考察了小学和初中教师对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童行为和药物干预措施的接受程度。来自四个郊区学区的147名教师阅读了描述两种行为干预措施(即每日报告和反应代价程序)以及使用精神兴奋剂药物治疗ADHD的短文,然后对每种措施的可接受性进行评分。将教师对可接受性的评分作为ADHD知识和教学经验水平的函数进行考察。结果表明,小学和初中教师均认为每日报告比反应代价和兴奋剂药物更可接受。此外,教师认为药物与行为干预措施联合使用时比单独使用时更可接受。ADHD知识和教学年限通常与可接受性评分无关。聚类分析表明,就对治疗可接受性的看法而言,教师可分为几种不同的类型。