Kroboth P D, McAuley J W, Kroboth F J, Bertz R J, Smith R B
University of Pittsburgh Pharmacodynamic Research Center, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4):259-62. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508000-00004.
This study was designed to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of triazolam, 0.25 mg, after the administration of the marketed oral tablet and a sublingual prototype wafer; an intravenous dose was used as a reference. Twelve men were evaluated in a three-way crossover study; study days were separated by 1 week. A single dose was administered to each subject at approximately 8 a.m.; serial blood samples were obtained for the determination of triazolam concentration. The fraction absorbed relative to intravenous was 20% higher in the sublingual than in the oral treatment (p = 0.0128); the difference between treatments was greatest in the first 2 hours as indicated by the area under the curve from 0 to 2 hours (p < 0.05). The extraction ratio ranged from 0.05 to 0.25, and the predicted availability after oral administration was 86% with a range of 75 to 95%. In contrast, the observed mean absolute availability was 44% (oral) and 53% (sublingual). A potential explanation for this discrepancy between predicted and observed bioavailability is that after oral administration, a fraction of triazolam may be metabolized by cytochrome P450IIIA4 in the gut wall, with a separate fraction subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Although this study was not designed to identify sites of triazolam metabolism, the proposed explanation is consistent with the occurrence of P450IIIA4 in the stomach, small intestine, and liver. Doses administered sublingually avoid first-pass metabolism, producing earlier and higher peak concentrations than do doses administered orally.
本研究旨在评估服用市售口服片剂和舌下原型薄片后,0.25毫克三唑仑的相对生物利用度和绝对生物利用度;以静脉注射剂量作为对照。12名男性参与了一项三交叉研究;研究日之间间隔1周。在上午8点左右给每位受试者单次给药;采集系列血样以测定三唑仑浓度。相对于静脉注射,舌下给药吸收分数比口服给药高20%(p = 0.0128);如0至2小时曲线下面积所示,两种给药方式之间的差异在最初2小时最大(p < 0.05)。提取率范围为0.05至0.25,口服给药后的预测生物利用度为86%,范围在75%至95%之间。相比之下,观察到的平均绝对生物利用度口服为44%,舌下为53%。预测生物利用度与观察到的生物利用度之间存在差异的一个可能解释是,口服给药后,一部分三唑仑可能在肠壁被细胞色素P450IIIA4代谢,另一部分在肝脏进行首过代谢。尽管本研究并非旨在确定三唑仑的代谢部位,但所提出的解释与胃、小肠和肝脏中存在P450IIIA4是一致的。舌下给药可避免首过代谢,比口服给药产生更早、更高的峰值浓度。