Ketefian S, Lenz E R
University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Prof Nurs. 1995 Sep-Oct;11(5):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80006-7.
In part II of this two-part series reporting on a survey of doctorate-granting schools of nursing on scientific integrity, the authors deal with publication and authorship practices, promotion/tenure policies, and suggested strategies to promote scientific integrity at institutional and broader levels, and the role of various agents in this regard. The findings suggest the importance of the role of senior faculty in socializing and serving as role models for junior colleagues and doctoral students. Professional journals and professional organizations were similarly seen to have a role in standard setting. At the institutional level, educational/facilitative functions, as well as leadership and monitoring activities, were highlighted. The essay presents recommendations for promoting scientific integrity in a proactive manner rather than focusing on procedures for dealing with misconduct.
在这个关于护理博士授予学校科学诚信调查的两部分系列报道的第二部分中,作者探讨了出版和署名做法、晋升/终身教职政策,以及在机构和更广泛层面促进科学诚信的建议策略,以及各相关方在这方面的作用。研究结果表明,资深教员在引导初级同事和博士生并为其树立榜样方面的作用至关重要。专业期刊和专业组织在标准制定方面也被认为发挥着作用。在机构层面,强调了教育/促进功能以及领导和监督活动。本文提出了以积极主动的方式促进科学诚信的建议,而不是专注于处理不当行为的程序。