• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从作者身份到贡献者身份。促进研究发表的诚信。

From authorship to contributorship. Promoting integrity in research publication.

作者信息

White A H, Coudret N A, Goodwin C S

机构信息

University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, USA.

出版信息

Nurse Educ. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199811000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00006223-199811000-00010
PMID:9934109
Abstract

Shared authorship in nursing research presents practical and ethical dilemmas and does not effectively capture individual research participation and accountability. This study, which defined author contributions and practices in multiauthored nursing research, contributed to a better understanding of contemporary author participation and the inherent challenges faced by nurse scholars in determining authorship credit. A method of "contributorship" is proposed which would delineate individual contributions to the research project while maintaining professional integrity, scientific accountability, and scholarly recognition.

摘要

护理研究中的共同作者身份带来了实际和伦理困境,且无法有效体现个人的研究参与度和责任。本研究界定了多作者护理研究中的作者贡献和做法,有助于更好地理解当代作者的参与情况以及护士学者在确定作者署名权时面临的内在挑战。本文提出了一种“贡献者身份”方法,该方法将在保持职业操守、科学责任和学术认可的同时,明确个人对研究项目的贡献。

相似文献

1
From authorship to contributorship. Promoting integrity in research publication.从作者身份到贡献者身份。促进研究发表的诚信。
Nurse Educ. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199811000-00010.
2
Moving toward policy development on assigning publication credit for oncology nurses' contributions to scholarly and scientific work.
Can Oncol Nurs J. 1998 May;8(2):108-20. doi: 10.5737/1181912x82108113.
3
A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research.出版物与研究中伦理问题的初步调查。
J Soc Behav Pers. 1995;10(2):281-91.
4
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.多学科/跨学科健康科学研究出版物中作者排序的最佳实践。
Account Res. 2017;24(4):243-267. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts.研究诚信与不当行为:概念的澄清
Curationis. 2006 Mar;29(1):40-5. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v29i1.1042.
6
Co-authorship--a means to an end.共同署名——达成目的的一种手段。
Nurs Prax N Z. 1998 Jul;13(2):44-8.
7
Authorship, dissemination of research findings, and related matters.
Appl Nurs Res. 1999 May;12(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(99)80382-6.
8
Ethical issues faced by nursing editors.护理编辑面临的伦理问题。
West J Nurs Res. 2005 Jun;27(4):487-99. doi: 10.1177/0193945905274906.
9
The nurse scholar of the 21st century.21世纪的护理学者。
Nurs Sci Q. 2000 Apr;13(2):116-23. doi: 10.1177/089431840001300205.
10
Ethics and the research realist.
Nurse Educ. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):108-10. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200105000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.合作科学中与作者分歧相关的不当行为和不端行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1967-1993. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
2
A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines.一项系统综述,对各学术领域中关于作者身份的意义、伦理和实践的研究进行了综述。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023477. Epub 2011 Sep 8.