Timberlake W, Engle M
Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Oct;21(4):304-17. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.4.304.
To test for retrospective effects of sucrose ingestion in the anticipatory contrast procedure, 4 experiments examined intake of an initial 0.15% saccharin solution as a function of the unsignaled interspersing of days in which the 2nd solution was 32% sucrose or 0.15% saccharin. In Experiment 1, rats that received alternating saccharin-saccharin days and saccharin-sucrose days drank less saccharin on saccharin-only days, and on both days they drank less saccharin than a control group that received saccharin only. In Experiment 2, rats that received randomized saccharin-saccharin and saccharin-sucrose days drank less saccharin if, and only if, a sucrose day preceded. Experiments 3 and 4 used double and quadruple alternation of saccharin and sucrose days to examine persistence of the effects of a sucrose day. The results highlighted a retrospective carryover effect of sucrose that reduced intake of the initial saccharin solution and apparently was based on sucrose memories persisting over days.
为了在预期性对比程序中测试蔗糖摄入的回顾性影响,进行了4项实验,研究初始0.15%糖精溶液的摄入量如何随未提示的穿插天数而变化,在这些穿插天数中,第二种溶液为32%蔗糖或0.15%糖精。在实验1中,接受糖精-糖精日和糖精-蔗糖日交替的大鼠在仅摄入糖精的日子里喝的糖精较少,并且在这两天里,它们喝的糖精都比仅接受糖精的对照组少。在实验2中,接受随机的糖精-糖精日和糖精-蔗糖日的大鼠,只有在蔗糖日之前时,才会喝较少的糖精。实验3和实验4使用糖精日和蔗糖日的双交替和四交替来研究蔗糖日影响的持续性。结果突出了蔗糖的回顾性遗留效应,这种效应减少了初始糖精溶液的摄入量,并且显然是基于持续数天的蔗糖记忆。