Ferris D G, Litaker M S, Woodward L, Mathis D, Hendrich J
Medical Effectiveness Education and Research Program, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1995 Nov;41(5):443-9.
Treatment options for bacterial vaginosis are numerous. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral metronidazole, metronidazole vaginal gel, and clindamycin vaginal cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis using traditional clinical and laboratory methods, as well as a new DNA probe test. We also determined the percentage of patients receiving each treatment who developed posttreatment vaginal candidiasis, a potential complication of treating bacterial vaginosis.
One hundred one women in whom bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed by standard criteria were randomly assigned to receive: oral metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 1 week, 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel 5 g twice daily for 5 days, or 2% clindamycin vaginal cream 5 g once daily for 7 days. Women with coexisting vulvovaginal candidiasis or vaginal trichomoniasis were excluded. Tests of cure by vaginal saline wet prep and potassium hydroxide microscopic examinations, Gram's stain, pH and DNA probe tests for Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida species were scheduled 7 to 14 days following treatment.
There were no statistically significant differences in cure rates for oral metronidazole (84.2%), metronidazole vaginal gel (75.0%), or clindamycin vaginal cream (86.2%) (chi 2 = 1.204, df = 2, P = .548) using traditional clinical and laboratory criteria. Cure rates were lower based on DNA testing, indicating that Gardnerella vaginalis may remain after a clinical cure. This would explain cases of recurrent disease. Posttreatment vulvovaginal candidiasis was experienced by 12.5% of subjects treated with oral metronidazole, 14.8% of subjects treated with clindamycin vaginal cream, and 30.4% of subjects treated with metronidazole vaginal gel (chi 2 = 2.607, df = 2, P = .272).
Oral metronidazole, metronidazole vaginal gel, and clindamycin vaginal cream achieved nearly equivalent cure rates for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Patients treated with these agents experienced similar rates of posttreatment vulvovaginal candidiasis, but those using the intravaginal products reported being more satisfied with the treatment.
细菌性阴道病的治疗选择众多。本研究的目的是使用传统临床和实验室方法以及一种新的DNA探针检测,比较口服甲硝唑、甲硝唑阴道凝胶和克林霉素阴道乳膏治疗细菌性阴道病的疗效。我们还确定了接受每种治疗的患者发生治疗后阴道念珠菌病的百分比,这是治疗细菌性阴道病的一种潜在并发症。
101名根据标准诊断为细菌性阴道病的女性被随机分配接受以下治疗:口服甲硝唑500毫克,每日两次,共1周;0.75%甲硝唑阴道凝胶5克,每日两次,共5天;或2%克林霉素阴道乳膏5克,每日一次,共7天。排除同时患有外阴阴道念珠菌病或阴道滴虫病的女性。在治疗后7至14天安排进行阴道生理盐水湿片检查、氢氧化钾显微镜检查、革兰氏染色、pH值以及阴道加德纳菌和念珠菌属的DNA探针检测以确定是否治愈。
使用传统临床和实验室标准,口服甲硝唑(84.2%)、甲硝唑阴道凝胶(75.0%)或克林霉素阴道乳膏(86.2%)的治愈率无统计学显著差异(卡方 = 1.204,自由度 = 2,P = 0.548)。基于DNA检测的治愈率较低,表明临床治愈后阴道加德纳菌可能仍存在。这可以解释复发病例。接受口服甲硝唑治疗的受试者中有12.5%发生治疗后外阴阴道念珠菌病,接受克林霉素阴道乳膏治疗的受试者中有14.8%,接受甲硝唑阴道凝胶治疗的受试者中有30.4%(卡方 = 2.607,自由度 = 2,P = 0.272)。
口服甲硝唑、甲硝唑阴道凝胶和克林霉素阴道乳膏治疗细菌性阴道病的治愈率几乎相当。接受这些药物治疗的患者发生治疗后外阴阴道念珠菌病的比例相似,但使用阴道内用药的患者对治疗的满意度更高。