Haffner C A, Kendall M J, Struthers A D, Bridges A, Stott D J
Department of Health Care for the Elderly, Selly Oak Hospital, West Midlands, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1995 May;71(835):287-92. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.835.287.
To compare the effects on renal function of captopril and enalapril in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.
A multi-centre double-blind parallel-group comparison of the two angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, captopril (12.5 mg bid) and enalapril (2.5 mg bid).
80 elderly patients with chronic heart failure (41 in the captopril group, 39 in the enalapril group).
The blood pressure and pulse rate response to the first dose of ACE inhibitor was assessed in all patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured radioisotopically by 99mTcDTPA or 51CrEDTA clearance after three and six months of each treatment. Subgroups were assessed for effective renal plasma flow (33 patients), exercise tolerance (25 patients) and by a symptom-oriented questionnaire (45 patients).
No serious adverse effect on GFR was noticed. There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the mean baseline GFR or in changes from baseline at three and six months (captopril mean baseline GFR 49.6 ml min-1 1.76 m-2, enalapril 54.7 ml min-1 1.76 m-2; mean change (95% confidence interval) at three months captopril 12 ml min-1 (+3.0, +21.0), enalapril -2 ml min-1 (-13.0; +9.0); mean change at six months, captopril 3.7 ml min-1 (-6.7; +14.2), enalapril -6.0 ml min-1 (-21.0; +9.4). Significantly more patients given captopril had an improvement in GFR during the study period (26/31 compared with 20/31 enalapril-treated patients at three months, p = 0.0096, and 23/30 compared with 15/27 at six months, p = 0.021). There were no significant changes in effective renal plasma flow. Three patients treated with enalapril developed symptomatic hypotension within three days of starting treatment. Quality of life questionnaires revealed more gastrointestinal symptoms in the enalapril group (p = 0.039).
Captopril seems marginally preferable to enalapril in the treatment of chronic heart failure in elderly patients.
比较卡托普利和依那普利对老年慢性心力衰竭患者肾功能的影响。
对两种血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂卡托普利(12.5毫克,每日两次)和依那普利(2.5毫克,每日两次)进行多中心双盲平行组比较。
80例老年慢性心力衰竭患者(卡托普利组41例,依那普利组39例)。
评估所有患者首次服用ACE抑制剂后的血压和心率反应。在每种治疗的3个月和6个月后,通过99mTcDTPA或51CrEDTA清除率放射性同位素测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)。对亚组患者评估有效肾血浆流量(33例患者)、运动耐量(25例患者),并通过症状导向问卷进行评估(45例患者)。
未发现对GFR有严重不良影响。两种治疗在平均基线GFR或3个月和6个月时相对于基线的变化方面无显著差异(卡托普利平均基线GFR为49.6毫升·分钟-1·1.76米-2,依那普利为54.7毫升·分钟-1·1.76米-2;3个月时平均变化(95%置信区间),卡托普利为12毫升·分钟-1(+3.0,+21.0),依那普利为-2毫升·分钟-1(-13.0;+9.0);6个月时平均变化,卡托普利为3.7毫升·分钟-1(-6.7;+14.2),依那普利为-6.0毫升·分钟-1(-21.0;+9.4)。在研究期间,服用卡托普利的患者中GFR改善的人数显著更多(3个月时,卡托普利组26/31例,依那普利组20/31例,p = 0.0096;6个月时,卡托普利组23/30例,依那普利组15/27例,p = 0.021)。有效肾血浆流量无显著变化。3例接受依那普利治疗的患者在开始治疗后3天内出现症状性低血压。生活质量问卷显示依那普利组胃肠道症状更多(p = 0.039)。
在老年患者慢性心力衰竭的治疗中,卡托普利似乎略优于依那普利。