Vanek V W, Bourguet C C
Department of Surgery, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown 44272, USA.
Surg Endosc. 1995 Mar;9(3):314-23; discussion 324. doi: 10.1007/BF00187776.
This retrospective study reviewed the hospital and professional costs, charges, and reimbursements for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap chole) and open cholecystectomy (open chole) and compared the two procedures. There was no significant difference in hospital costs between lap and open chole procedures; however, there were marked differences in the categories of costs for each procedure. The mean total (hospital and professional) charge was 8% greater for lap chole. The mean total (hospital and professional) reimbursement for patients with private insurance was 23% greater for lap chole, but no significant difference was seen for patients on Medicare or Medicaid. Lap chole patients returned to work 11 days sooner than open chole patients; this can result in a 69% decrease in short-term disability costs to employers. The clinical variables that significantly affect total charges and reimbursement are discussed.
这项回顾性研究回顾了腹腔镜胆囊切除术(lap chole)和开腹胆囊切除术(open chole)的医院费用、专业费用、收费及报销情况,并对这两种手术进行了比较。lap chole和open chole手术的医院费用没有显著差异;然而,每种手术的费用类别存在明显差异。lap chole的平均总(医院和专业)收费高出8%。有私人保险的lap chole患者的平均总(医院和专业)报销比open chole患者高出23%,但医疗保险或医疗补助患者之间未观察到显著差异。lap chole患者比open chole患者早11天恢复工作;这可使雇主的短期残疾成本降低69%。文中讨论了显著影响总收费和报销的临床变量。