• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用增量/诊断相关分组(DRG)图表和决策树分析为胆囊炎选择具有成本效益的手术。

Using delta/DRG diagrams and decision tree analysis to select a cost-effective surgery for cholecystitis.

作者信息

Weiland D E, Caruso D M, Kassir A, Bay R C, Malone J M

机构信息

Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85010, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):175-80.

PMID:9876669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3021267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many studies have attempted cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to open cholecystectomy. However, these analyses have included costs, charges, expenses, etc., and at times they have been used interchangeably. This paper demonstrates how DRG diagrams containing charges and length-of-stay, preoperative prediction of conversion rates, decision-tree construction and sensitivity analysis can be used to select the most cost-efficient operation for a given patient with cholecystitis.

METHODS

A Delta DRG analysis for complicated cholecystectomy (DRG 195) showed the hospital to be an extreme outlier in both charges and length of stay. Record review indicated that 55% of the cases were converted laparoscopic cholecystectomies and the remainder were aged or younger patients with advanced disease. Chart and literature review determined the causes and the probability of conversion. Data were then placed into decision-tree and sensitivity analyses. The most cost-effective operation for a given probability of conversion was demonstrated.

RESULTS

Three preoperative findings and combinations of each predicted conversion rates and analysis showed that the charge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy must be held below the range of $5,361-$13,084 to make routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

This method demonstrated that using Delta/DRG, decision-tree and sensitivity analysis offers physicians, hospitals and other health-care providers a method of evaluating the treatment of DRG categories to determine the most cost-effective management.

摘要

背景与目的

许多研究尝试对腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术进行成本分析。然而,这些分析涵盖了成本、收费、费用等,有时它们被交替使用。本文展示了如何利用包含收费和住院时长的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)图表、术前转化率预测、决策树构建以及敏感性分析,为特定胆囊炎患者选择最具成本效益的手术方式。

方法

对复杂胆囊切除术(DRG 195)的Delta DRG分析显示,该医院在收费和住院时长方面都是极端异常值。病历审查表明,55%的病例是腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹的,其余是患有晚期疾病的老年或年轻患者。通过图表和文献回顾确定了中转开腹的原因及概率。然后将数据进行决策树和敏感性分析。展示了针对给定中转概率最具成本效益的手术方式。

结果

三项术前检查结果及其组合对转化率的预测和分析表明,要使常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有成本效益,腹腔镜胆囊切除术的收费必须保持在5361美元至13084美元的范围以下。

结论

该方法表明,使用Delta/DRG、决策树和敏感性分析为医生、医院及其他医疗服务提供者提供了一种评估DRG分类治疗以确定最具成本效益管理方式的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/e061b30c4415/jsls-1-2-175-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/d83d32730efb/jsls-1-2-175-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/1dffc6b358e2/jsls-1-2-175-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/534c9f9b5918/jsls-1-2-175-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/b4d595a2cca3/jsls-1-2-175-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/4ce5cb49d3a5/jsls-1-2-175-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/37191c5b078b/jsls-1-2-175-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/0b73c42e062f/jsls-1-2-175-g07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/d85f4597c94d/jsls-1-2-175-g08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/2db5a5fb556e/jsls-1-2-175-g09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/e061b30c4415/jsls-1-2-175-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/d83d32730efb/jsls-1-2-175-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/1dffc6b358e2/jsls-1-2-175-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/534c9f9b5918/jsls-1-2-175-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/b4d595a2cca3/jsls-1-2-175-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/4ce5cb49d3a5/jsls-1-2-175-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/37191c5b078b/jsls-1-2-175-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/0b73c42e062f/jsls-1-2-175-g07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/d85f4597c94d/jsls-1-2-175-g08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/2db5a5fb556e/jsls-1-2-175-g09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/3021267/e061b30c4415/jsls-1-2-175-g10.jpg

相似文献

1
Using delta/DRG diagrams and decision tree analysis to select a cost-effective surgery for cholecystitis.使用增量/诊断相关分组(DRG)图表和决策树分析为胆囊炎选择具有成本效益的手术。
JSLS. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):175-80.
2
How managed care may choose hospitals for contracts for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.管理式医疗如何为腹腔镜胆囊切除术合同选择医院。
JSLS. 1997 Jul-Sep;1(3):285-8.
3
Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.急性胆囊炎的治疗。开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Apr;15(4):398-401. doi: 10.1007/s004640000333. Epub 2000 Dec 12.
4
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
5
A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的成本最小化分析。
Am J Surg. 1996 Oct;172(4):305-10. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00197-3.
6
Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.德国卫生保健系统中作为典型手术的保留幽门胰头切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的收益比较分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1091-4. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in infants and children: modifications and cost analysis.婴幼儿腹腔镜胆囊切除术:改良与成本分析
J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Jul;29(7):900-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90012-4.
8
Is academic managed care an oxymoron?学术性管理式医疗是一种矛盾修饰法吗?
Am J Surg. 1995 Dec;170(6):651-4; discussion 654-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80035-x.
9
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed Via the "Marionette" Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population.在特定患者群体中,经“牵线木偶”技术实施的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术在疗效和成本方面与标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术相当。
Am Surg. 2015 Oct;81(10):1015-20.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性或坏疽性胆囊炎。
Am Surg. 1994 May;60(5):326-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of prospective payment systems on cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前瞻性支付系统对胆囊切除术影响的评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024 Aug 31;28(3):291-301. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-038. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-Based Prospective Hospital Payment System can be well adopted for Acute Care Surgery: Taiwanese Experience with Acute Cholecystitis.按疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的前瞻性医院支付系统能很好地适用于急症外科:台湾急性胆囊炎的经验。
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):1080-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05904-5. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
2
The laparoscopic buck stops here!
Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):472-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80943-2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的成本效益
Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):466-71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80942-0.
Prediction of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery with artificial neural networks.
利用人工神经网络预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹手术的情况。
BMC Surg. 2009 Aug 21;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-13.
4
Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中转开腹的决定因素
Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1):35-9; discussion 39-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90051-5.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open?腹腔镜胆囊切除术。术前因素能否预测转为开腹手术的必要性?
Surg Endosc. 1994 Aug;8(8):875-8; discussion 879-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00843458.
6
The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital.社区医院中腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的费用
Surg Endosc. 1995 Mar;9(3):314-23; discussion 324. doi: 10.1007/BF00187776.
7
Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜激光胆囊切除术
Am J Surg. 1990 Nov;160(5):485-7; discussion 488-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81009-8.
8
Hospital charges for laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.
JAMA. 1991 Dec 25;266(24):3425-6.
9
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial analysis.开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:初步分析
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Aug;1(4):193-6. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.193.
10
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和有效性。对100例初治患者的前瞻性分析。
Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199101000-00002.