Cox J T
Gynecology Clinic, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA.
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Mar;9(1):1-37. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80357-8.
The evidence implicating specific HPV types in the aetiology of cervical cancer is now strong enough to establish a causative role. HPV infection of the cervix affects the developing immature metaplastic cells of the transformation zone. Cervical neoplasia can be viewed as the interaction of high risk papillomavirus and immature metaplastic epithelium. Once maturity is reached, there is minimal risk of subsequent development of cervical squamous neoplasia. Exposure to HPV is an extremely common event, especially in young sexually active women. Yet, despite frequent HPV exposure at that phase of life in which the cervical transformation zone is at its most vulnerable, established expressed disease is relatively uncommon. Most studies in which the natural history of CIN is not altered by cervical biopsy reveal a progression rate from low to high grade CIN of less than one third. Where viral type is taken into account, however, the progression rate from normal but high risk HPV-infected cervical epithelium to CIN 2 or 3 is higher. Despite this, most cervical abnormalities will not transform into invasive cancer, even if left untreated. The variance between the high rate of HPV infection, the intermediate rate of CIN and the relatively low rate of cervical cancer establishes a stepwise gradient of disease of increasing severity with decreasing prevalence. In an immunocompetent host, HPV infection alone does not appear to be sufficient to induce the step from high grade CIN to invasion. Epidemiological studies indicating that HPV infection with oncogenic viral types is far more common than cervical neoplasia suggest the necessity of cofactors in cervical carcinogenesis. The long time-lag between initial infection and eventual malignant conversion suggests that random events may be necessary for such conversion, and the spontaneous regression of many primary lesions suggests that most patients are not exposed to these random events. Potential cofactors include cigarette smoking, hormonal effects of oral contraceptives and pregnancy, dietary deficiencies, immunosuppression and chronic inflammation. In those women who develop cervical cancer, malignant progression is rarely rapid, more commonly taking many years or decades. Malignant progression has been documented in patients who presented initially with only low grade HPV-induced atypia. On the other hand, progression may be a misnomer, as 'apparent' progression may really represent adjacent 'de novo' development of higher grade CIN. Although most cervical cancers contain high risk HPV types, up to 15% of such cancers test negative for HPV, raising the possibility that a few, usually more aggressive, cervical cancers may arise from from a non-viral source.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
目前,有充分证据表明特定的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)类型在宫颈癌病因学中起着致病作用。宫颈HPV感染会影响转化区正在发育的未成熟化生细胞。宫颈肿瘤可被视为高危乳头瘤病毒与未成熟化生上皮相互作用的结果。一旦细胞成熟,后续发生宫颈鳞状肿瘤的风险就会降至最低。接触HPV是极为常见的现象,尤其是在年轻的性活跃女性中。然而,尽管在宫颈转化区最易受影响的生命阶段频繁接触HPV,但确诊的显性疾病却相对少见。大多数未因宫颈活检改变CIN自然病程的研究显示,从低级别CIN进展为高级别CIN的比例不到三分之一。然而,若考虑病毒类型,从正常但感染高危HPV的宫颈上皮进展为CIN 2或3的比例则更高。尽管如此,大多数宫颈异常即便不治疗也不会发展为浸润癌。HPV高感染率、CIN中等发生率与宫颈癌相对低发生率之间的差异,形成了一种疾病严重程度逐步递增而患病率逐渐降低的梯度变化。在免疫功能正常的宿主中,仅HPV感染似乎不足以促使从高级别CIN发展为浸润癌。流行病学研究表明,致癌性HPV感染远比宫颈肿瘤常见,这提示宫颈癌发生过程中存在辅助因素。初次感染与最终恶性转化之间存在较长的时间间隔,这表明随机事件可能是这种转化所必需的,而且许多原发性病变会自发消退,这表明大多数患者未遭遇这些随机事件。潜在的辅助因素包括吸烟、口服避孕药和怀孕的激素影响、饮食缺乏、免疫抑制及慢性炎症。在罹患宫颈癌的女性中,恶性进展很少迅速发生,通常需要数年或数十年时间。在最初仅表现为低级别HPV诱导的异型增生的患者中,已有恶性进展的记录。另一方面,进展可能是个不恰当的说法,因为“明显的”进展可能实际上代表着相邻部位更高级别CIN的“新生”发展。尽管大多数宫颈癌含有高危HPV类型,但高达15%的此类癌症HPV检测呈阴性,这增加了少数(通常更具侵袭性)宫颈癌可能源于非病毒来源的可能性。(摘要截选至400字)