Veglio M, Chinaglia A, Borra M, Perin P C
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Italy.
Diabet Med. 1995 Apr;12(4):302-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00481.x.
The question as to whether the QTc interval correlates with five cardiovascular tests (deep breathing test, 30/15 ratio test, lying to standing test, cough test, and postural blood pressure test) for the diagnosis of diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) was investigated in 168 (38 Type 1, 130 Type 2) consecutive outpatients (mean age 54.9 +/- 11.2 years). QT interval was measured on an ECG recorded at rest and QTc calculated according to Bazett's formula. The percentage of patients with a QTc greater than 0.440 s was: absent DAN = 11% (n = 7), probable DAN = 7% (n = 4), definite DAN = 23% (n = 12) (p < 0.05), and the mean (+/- SD) QTc values were 0.403 +/- 0.028 s, 0.405 +/- 0.023 s, and 0.421 +/- 0.026 s, respectively. A significant correlation between QTc duration and DAN score of autonomic cardiovascular test results (r = 0.34, p < 0.0001) was observed. The calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values were 89%, 15%, 70% and 37%, respectively. In conclusion, QTc can be considered as an additional specific test in the assessment of diabetic autonomic neuropathy, but cannot replace the standard battery of cardiovascular tests.
对168例(1型糖尿病38例,2型糖尿病130例)连续门诊患者(平均年龄54.9±11.2岁)进行了研究,以探讨QTc间期是否与五项心血管检查(深呼吸试验、30/15比值试验、平卧位到站立位试验、咳嗽试验和体位性血压试验)相关,用于诊断糖尿病自主神经病变(DAN)。在静息状态下记录的心电图上测量QT间期,并根据Bazett公式计算QTc。QTc大于0.440秒的患者百分比为:无DAN = 11%(n = 7),可能DAN = 7%(n = 4),确诊DAN = 23%(n = 12)(p < 0.05),平均(±标准差)QTc值分别为0.403±0.028秒、0.405±0.023秒和0.421±0.026秒。观察到QTc持续时间与自主神经心血管检查结果的DAN评分之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.34,p < 0.0001)。计算出的特异性、敏感性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为89%、15%、70%和37%。总之,QTc可被视为评估糖尿病自主神经病变的一项额外特异性检查,但不能替代标准的心血管检查组合。