Gustafsson B, Theorell T
National Institute for Psychosocial Factors and Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dysphagia. 1995 Spring;10(2):86-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00440077.
Using a definition based on Bowlby and Pörn, an effort is made to interpret adaptedness and coping in 87 dysphagic students (corresponding to a prevalence of dysphagia in 9% of the boys and 12% of the girls) found in a screening study utilizing a questionnaire. Coping patterns and methods of adaptation were explored in a telephone interview with dysphagic students. Those who stated that their dysphagia influenced their daily living were classified as subjectively maladapted (S-maladapted; n = 9). Compared with the S-adapted students, the S-maladapted students reported more defects in ability to eat, more inappropriate beliefs about the causes and management of dysphagia, and greater desires regarding eating than S-adapted students (p < 0.05). The environmental conditions more often impaired the eating ability in S-maladapted students (p < 0.05). Anxiety at mealtime was reported more frequently than in S-adapted students (p < 0.05). Every second S-maladapted student had reduced self-esteem because of dysphagia (p < 0.05). The S-maladapted students had talked about their dysphagia with parents and/or friends and visited a school physician because of dysphagia more often than S-adapted students (p < 0.05). Two of 9 students felt confirmed by the physician and experienced help. There was concordance between the students' own beliefs regarding the causes of dysphagia and corresponding coping strategy.
基于鲍尔比(Bowlby)和珀恩(Pörn)的定义,研究人员通过问卷调查对87名吞咽困难学生(男孩患病率为9%,女孩患病率为12%)的适应性和应对方式进行了解读。通过电话访谈吞咽困难学生,探究了他们的应对模式和适应方法。那些表示吞咽困难影响其日常生活的学生被归类为主观适应不良(S-适应不良;n = 9)。与适应良好的学生相比,适应不良的学生在进食能力方面存在更多缺陷,对吞咽困难的原因和处理有更多不恰当的认知,并且在饮食方面的欲望比适应良好的学生更强烈(p < 0.05)。环境条件更常损害适应不良学生的进食能力(p < 0.05)。与适应良好的学生相比,适应不良的学生在进餐时更频繁地出现焦虑情绪(p < 0.05)。每两名适应不良的学生中就有一名因吞咽困难而自尊心下降(p < 0.05)。与适应良好的学生相比,适应不良的学生更常与父母和/或朋友谈论自己的吞咽困难,并且因吞咽困难而就诊于校医(p < 0.05)。9名学生中有2名得到了医生的确认并获得了帮助。学生自身对吞咽困难原因的认知与相应的应对策略之间存在一致性。