Jørgensen H S, Nakayama H, Raaschou H O, Larsen K, Hübbe P, Olsen T S
Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stroke. 1995 Jul;26(7):1178-82. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.7.1178.
Treatment of stroke patients in specialized stroke units has become more frequent, yet the effect of this treatment has not been determined.
In a community-based, prospective, and consecutive study of 1241 unselected acute stroke patients, we compared outcome of stroke treatment between two neighboring communities within Greater Copenhagen: the Bispebjerg community, where all acute stroke patients are treated and rehabilitated on a stroke unit, and Frederiksberg community, where all acute stroke patients are treated and rehabilitated on general neurological and medical wards. Except for the different organization of stroke treatment, the two communities and the two patient groups were comparable. Specifically, age, sex, marital status, prestroke residence, and stroke severity were not statistically different between patients treated on the stroke unit and those treated on the general neurological and medical wards. Multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the independent influence of stroke unit treatment on outcome.
Stroke unit treatment significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.74; P < .001), case-fatality rate (OR, 0.45; CI, 0.28 to 0.71; P < .001), 6-month mortality (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.39 to 0.82; P = .002), 1-year mortality (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.42 to 0.84; P = .003), and discharge rate to a nursing home (OR, 0.61; CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .04). Discharge rate to the patient's own home was significantly increased (OR, 1.90; CI, 1.30 to 2.70; P < .001). The length of hospital stay (including rehabilitation) was reduced significantly by 30% in patients treated on the stroke unit despite their lower mortality (P < .001). The savings due to stroke unit treatment were estimated at 1313 bed-days and three places at a nursing home per 100 stroke patients.
Treatment of unselected acute stroke patients on a stroke care unit saved lives, reduced the length of hospital stay, reduced the frequency of discharge to a nursing home, and potentially reduced cost.
在专门的卒中单元对卒中患者进行治疗已变得更为常见,但这种治疗的效果尚未确定。
在一项基于社区的前瞻性连续研究中,我们纳入了1241例未经挑选的急性卒中患者,比较了大哥本哈根地区两个相邻社区的卒中治疗结局:比斯佩布杰尔社区,所有急性卒中患者在卒中单元接受治疗和康复;腓特烈斯贝社区,所有急性卒中患者在普通神经科和内科病房接受治疗和康复。除了卒中治疗的组织方式不同外,两个社区和两组患者具有可比性。具体而言,在卒中单元接受治疗的患者与在普通神经科和内科病房接受治疗的患者在年龄、性别、婚姻状况、卒中前居住情况以及卒中严重程度方面无统计学差异。采用多因素回归分析来评估卒中单元治疗对结局的独立影响。
卒中单元治疗显著降低了住院死亡率(比值比[OR],0.50;95%置信区间[CI],0.34至0.74;P <.001)、病死率(OR,0.45;CI,0.28至0.71;P <.001)、6个月死亡率(OR,0.57;CI,0.39至0.82;P =.002)、1年死亡率(OR,0.59;CI,0.42至0.84;P =.003)以及转至疗养院的出院率(OR,0.61;CI,0.38至0.98;P =.04)。转至患者家中的出院率显著增加(OR,1.90;CI,1.30至2.70;P <.001)。尽管在卒中单元接受治疗的患者死亡率较低,但他们的住院时间(包括康复时间)显著缩短了30%(P <.001)。据估计,每100例卒中患者因卒中单元治疗节省了1313个床日和疗养院的三个床位。
在卒中护理单元对未经挑选的急性卒中患者进行治疗可挽救生命、缩短住院时间、降低转至疗养院的频率,并可能降低成本。