Wilson L D, Licata A L, Braverman I M, Edelson R L, Heald P W, Feldman A M, Kacinski B M
Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 15;32(4):987-95. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00073-8.
To evaluate the impact of systemic adjuvant therapies on relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT).
Between 1974 and 1990, TSEBT (36 Gy at 1 Gy/day; 9 weeks; 6 MeV electrons) was administered with curative intent to a total of 163 CTCL (mycosis fungoides) patients using six fields supplemented by orthovoltage boosts (120 kvp, 1 Gy x 20) to the perineum, soles of feet, and apical scalp (120 kvp, 2 Gy x 3). In this group, all patients who achieved a clinical complete response or a good partial response were offered one of two competing regimens of either adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or adjuvant extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP).
When the results for the group who achieved a complete response (CR) to TSEBT were analyzed, OS for T1 and T2 patients was excellent (85-90% at 5-10 years) and not improved by either adjuvant regimen. However, T3 and T4 patients who received either adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (75% at 3 years) or adjuvant ECP (100% at 3 years) had better overall survival than those who received neither adjuvant regimen (approximately 50% at 5 years). The difference between the OS curves for those who received ECP vs. those who received no adjuvant therapy approached statistical significance (p < 0.06), while a significant survival benefit from the addition of chemotherapy for TSEBT complete responders was not observed. Neither adjuvant therapy provided benefit with respect to relapse free survival after TSEBT.
These results suggest that an adjuvant nontoxic regimen of extracorporeal photochemotherapy may prolong survival in advanced stage CTCL patients who have achieved a complete remission after TSEBT. The combination of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide had no significant impact on overall survival in those patients who achieved CR to TSEBT, and neither adjuvant therapy had an impact on relapse free survival for all T-stages. Such results are the basis for the current development of a prospective, randomized trial studying the impact of ECP after TSEBT in patients with advanced stage CTCL.
评估全身辅助治疗对接受全身皮肤电子束治疗(TSEBT)的皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)患者无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。
1974年至1990年间,对163例CTCL(蕈样肉芽肿)患者进行了TSEBT(1 Gy/天,共36 Gy;9周;6 MeV电子),采用六个照射野,并对会阴、脚底和头皮顶部辅以正交电压增强照射(120 kvp,1 Gy×20)(120 kvp,2 Gy×3),治疗目的为治愈。在该组中,所有达到临床完全缓解或良好部分缓解的患者可选择两种相互竞争的辅助治疗方案之一,即辅助阿霉素/环磷酰胺或辅助体外光化学疗法(ECP)。
分析对TSEBT达到完全缓解(CR)的患者组的结果时,T1和T2期患者的总生存期极佳(5至10年时为85 - 90%),两种辅助治疗方案均未使其改善。然而,接受辅助阿霉素/环磷酰胺治疗的T3和T4期患者(3年时为75%)或接受辅助ECP治疗的患者(3年时为100%)的总生存期优于未接受任何辅助治疗方案的患者(5年时约为50%)。接受ECP治疗的患者与未接受辅助治疗的患者的总生存期曲线之间的差异接近统计学意义(p < 0.06),而未观察到对TSEBT完全缓解者加用化疗有显著的生存获益。两种辅助治疗方案对TSEBT后的无复发生存期均无益处。
这些结果表明,体外光化学疗法这种辅助无毒方案可能会延长TSEBT后达到完全缓解的晚期CTCL患者的生存期。阿霉素/环磷酰胺联合用药对TSEBT达到CR的患者的总生存期无显著影响,两种辅助治疗方案对所有T分期的无复发生存期均无影响。这些结果是目前开展一项前瞻性随机试验的基础,该试验旨在研究TSEBT后ECP对晚期CTCL患者的影响。